<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Alhawadeth News</title>
    <link>https://alhawadeth.net</link>
    <description>Latest news from Alhawadeth</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://alhawadeth.net/feed-en.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[How and Why Arab Americans Will Vote in 2026]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12904/How-and-Why-Arab-Americans-Will-Vote-in-2026?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12904/How-and-Why-Arab-Americans-Will-Vote-in-2026?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 16:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[Washington Watch, November 2, 2026Dr. James J. Zogby, President, Arab American Institute On Election Day, Arab Americans will overwhelmingly vote for Democrats over Republicans running in Senate and Congressional campaigns across the country. The actual margin is 59% for Democrats versus just 26% for Republicans. This dramatic swing back to the Democratic Party is just one of the findings of the most recent poll of Arab American voters commissioned by the Arab American Institute and conducted by John Zogby Strategies. AAI and JZS have been polling Arab American voters for over three decades and in all that time the community has favored Democrats if only by a small margin. The Iraq war and the Bush administration's widespread repressive policies against Arab and Muslim Americans and immigrants so significantly changed attitudes toward the two parties and their candidates that for more than a decade and a half Arab Americans ended up voting for Democrats by a two to one margin. This changed in 2024 as a result of the Biden administration's acquiescence to and, at times, overt support for Israel's genocidal war on Gaza. The community was so angered by Democrats' complicity in that war that support for Democrats declined, while Republican numbers rose. Democrats still had the edge, but in that November's presidential election a significant number of Arab Americans voted for third party candidates, while many didn't vote at all. What accounts for the flip back toward the Democratic Party's candidates in 2026? The recent AAI/JZS poll points to a number of factors; chief among them are the policies and behaviors of President Trump. Eighty-two percent (82%) of Arab Americans say they have personally experienced economic hardship due to the rising costs of health care, utilities, groceries, or gas prices. Ninety percent (90%) say that the war in Gaza is still important in determining their vote (and will remain so as they choose a presidential candidate in 2028). More than two-thirds say they have experienced discrimination because of their heritage, and an even greater percentage fear this may increase in the future. In this context, President Trump's anti-Muslim assault on Abdul El-Sayed, the Arab American Democratic Senate candidate in Michigan, has only added fuel to the dangerous fires of hate. Finally, it's important to note that, as our polling has demonstrated going back to a study issued in 2001, "What Ethnic Voters Really Think," Arab Americans, like other ethnic immigrant communities, while holding moderate views on some cultural issues, are quite liberal when addressing economic and governmental policies. This is borne out in the most recent AAI/JZS poll where 56% of Arab Americans say they are more aligned with the social and economic views of the Democratic Party versus only 28% who say they feel more aligned with the Republican Party. And when asked to describe their political ideology, ranging from MAGA Republican on the right to Democratic Socialist on the left, only 18% indicate a right-leaning ideology as opposed to 47% who are left-leaning. Thirty-one percent (31%) describe themselves as moderate. What is especially fascinating about the results in this poll is the extent of convergence in the views of the diverse component groups within the community. While there are some understandable variations in the responses given to a few questions, the most important demographic subgroups (Christian, Muslim; country of origin; immigrant or native US born) all express concern about the economic situation, the war in Gaza, and the fear of discrimination resulting from this election's hateful anti-Muslim, anti-Arab hate speech. Sectarian and national conflicts may afflict countries and regions across the Middle East, but Arab Americans have found their way to coalesce around shared heritage and issues of concern. It is this convergence that is the cornerstone of community building.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[From the Statue of Liberty to ICE Bullets: Is the Face of the American Dream Changing?]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12903/From-the-Statue-of-Liberty-to-ICE-Bullets%3A-Is-the-Face-of-the-American-Dream-Changing%3F?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12903/From-the-Statue-of-Liberty-to-ICE-Bullets%3A-Is-the-Face-of-the-American-Dream-Changing%3F?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA["Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free." These words, engraved on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty, were not just a poem welcoming immigrants. Over decades they became part of the image America presents to the world: a land of opportunity and freedom, and the last refuge for those seeking a better life. But what happens when the road to that dream turns into a scene of gunfire, and a father finds himself shot while his five-year-old child sits in the back seat? In Marble Hill, New York City, the scene was not just a passing security incident. It was a harsh test of the meaning of force, the limits of state power, and people's right to feel safe in the streets of their own city. A wounded father and a child in the back seat On October 8, 2026, Oscar Belgal, 28, was shot in the neck during an operation carried out by agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE, in the Marble Hill area of New York. According to preliminary information released by the NYPD, the man was in his car with a five-year-old child whom authorities said was his son. Agents in plain clothes, some wearing reflective vests and masks covering their faces, approached before the shooting. The New York police commissioner said an ICE agent fired at least seven rounds, one of which struck the man in the neck. He was taken to the hospital for treatment. The child was not physically hurt, but found himself at the center of an incident no child that age should witness. Here we must stop at the most important question: how can a law enforcement operation end with so many shots fired at a car with a small child inside? Asking the question does not mean prejudging the incident, nor ignoring the authorities' right to enforce the law. But it does mean that the use of firearms, especially on a residential street among families and children, must be subject to serious, independent scrutiny, and that every bullet must be explainable and accountable. Two accounts, and the evidence must decide The U.S. Department of Homeland Security gave an account different from that of local officials. It said the operation aimed to arrest the man, that he did not comply with orders, and that his car struck government vehicles and moved toward the agents, which the department said led them to fire in self-defense. New York officials, for their part, raised questions about how the operation was carried out and about the presence of masked agents in plain clothes with long guns in a residential neighborhood. Officials also called for a full and transparent investigation into the circumstances of the shooting. It is important here to separate what has been officially established, what each side says, and what still needs investigation. Merely accusing someone of wrongdoing does not give any agency immunity from accountability, and criticizing ICE's actions does not relieve a journalist of the duty to present the conflicting accounts accurately. This is not a trial on social media, nor a contest of accusations. It is about knowing what actually happened: How did the confrontation begin? What did the agents see before they fired? Was the use of force proportionate to the danger they faced? And what do the recordings, forensic evidence and eyewitness accounts reveal? These are questions that should be settled not by slogans, but by evidence. The child the bullet missed, but who was there Perhaps the most painful sentence in this incident is that the child came out without physical injury. It is an ending that could have been far more tragic, but it does not make the scene simple or ordinary. A child who watches his father being shot may carry fear and confusion that do not appear in medical reports. Children are not side details in security operations; they are people whose safety must be considered before decisions are made that could put their lives at risk. When an operation takes place in a residential neighborhood, near homes, schools and passersby, the responsibility is not limited to arresting the target; it also includes reducing the danger to anyone who may find themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time. No one is asking the authorities to abandon the law. What is asked is that the law be enforced in a way that does not make civilians fear their street will turn into a shooting range. New York and immigrants: the fear goes beyond one incident New York lives on the contributions of immigrants, from workers in restaurants and shops to taxi drivers, hospital staff and small business owners. In the city's five boroughs, different languages, cultures and experiences intertwine in daily life. That is why any controversial security operation cannot be read in isolation from the general climate. When people see masked agents approach a car and open fire in a residential neighborhood, the question is not only who the target was, but how safe residents feel, and how they can tell a lawful operation from a sudden danger whose source they do not understand. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and other officials expressed anger over the incident and demanded clear accountability, while federal authorities defended their agents' actions. This dispute reflects a wider struggle over immigration enforcement methods, the limits of cooperation between local and federal authorities, and the impact of these operations on the communities where immigrants live. But it is important that this debate not become a generalization about every law enforcement employee, or an assumption that every operation that ends with the use of force is necessarily unlawful. The right standard is to investigate each incident separately and assign responsibility based on the evidence. Has Americans' view of ICE changed? Debate over ICE's role and methods in enforcing immigration laws has grown, and arrests, deportations and the use of force have become the subject of escalating political and legal debate. Opinion polls published in the United States reflect division over the agency's performance and immigration policy in general; but reading any poll requires attention to when it was conducted, how its questions were worded, and how participants were chosen. So the opinion of a sample of Americans should not be taken as a final verdict on the whole society. More important than the numbers is that trust in institutions is not built by force alone. It needs clear rules, transparency, and accountability when there is evidence of abuses. If the state asks people to respect the law, it must show that its own institutions are subject to the same law. From the Statue of Liberty to the question of justice The irony is painful: at the entrance to New York Harbor stands the Statue of Liberty, a global symbol of hope, refuge and opportunity. And in one of the city's neighborhoods, a father is shot while his young child sits in the back seat. This image alone is not enough to condemn an entire institution, but it is enough to raise questions that must not be ignored. The United States has the right to enforce its immigration laws, and the authorities have the right to deal with real dangers. At the same time, every person has the right to know why force was used against them, society has the right to demand an independent and transparent investigation when bullets are fired on a residential street, and a child has the right to have his safety be a priority, not a detail mentioned after the fact. The value of the law shows not only when it is applied to the weak, but when those who enforce it are also held accountable. The question that must remain present until all the details are clear: can America protect its borders and enforce its laws without making fear the language in which immigrants relate to the streets where they live? Sources: Office of the Mayor of New York City (statement and press conference on the Marble Hill shooting, October 8, 2026); Office of the New York State Attorney General (statement, October 9, 2026); CBS New York; Reuters. By Ahmad Mourad, a journalist based in New York Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Three Religions and the Night of Fright: What Do Sheikhs, Priests and Rabbis Say About Halloween?]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12902/Three-Religions-and-the-Night-of-Fright%3A-What-Do-Sheikhs%2C-Priests-and-Rabbis-Say-About-Halloween%3F?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12902/Three-Religions-and-the-Night-of-Fright%3A-What-Do-Sheikhs%2C-Priests-and-Rabbis-Say-About-Halloween%3F?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[In a single night, American streets turn into a stage of masks, glowing pumpkins and frightening costumes, as children race to collect candy from door to door. But behind this seemingly innocent scene lies a question that sparks debate every year: is Halloween just a social occasion, or does taking part in it conflict with religious teachings? In New York, where Muslims, Christians and Jews live side by side, the question does not stay theoretical. It enters homes and schools and confronts parents: Should I let my child take part? Should I reject the occasion entirely, or treat it as a social custom that does not necessarily carry religious meaning? The "Night of Fright" is not just costumes and candy. It is an occasion that reveals differences in how people understand religion, tradition and identity, even among followers of the same faith. First: What does Islam say? Is Halloween forbidden? The Islamic position is not a single fatwa that everyone agrees on, and this is where the surprise begins. Egypt's Dar al-Ifta published a fatwa on July 22, 2013, on celebrating occasions such as Halloween and Valentine's Day, ruling that taking part in social occasions is permissible as long as it involves nothing contrary to Islamic belief. By contrast, the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA) published a fatwa by Sheikh Jamaal Zarabozo on October 30, 2011, concluding that Muslims may not take part in Halloween activities, based on religious considerations about the occasion's origin and imitating other peoples' festivals. Press reports also quoted Sheikh Ouweida Othman, a fatwa secretary at Egypt's Dar al-Ifta, warning against some forms of celebration that may conflict with religious and educational values. So we are looking at differing fatwas and interpretations, not a consensus that can rightly be attributed to all Muslim scholars. The question every parent should ask: does taking part mean simply wearing a costume and collecting candy, or does it involve practices the religion rejects? Does the child know the origin and meaning of the occasion, or is he taking part because his classmates do? Second: What does Christianity say? Is Halloween a satanic holiday? The irony is that the name Halloween itself comes from "All Hallows' Eve," the eve of All Saints' Day, which falls on November 1 in the Catholic tradition. According to Catholic Answers, Father Charles Grondin explained that the Catholic Church has no specific church teaching forbidding Halloween in general, and that activities should be judged by their nature and whether they glorify evil or involve practices contrary to the Christian faith. In Brooklyn, the rector of the Cathedral-Basilica of St. James published an article on October 23, 2025, on taking part wisely while avoiding the glorification of evil, violence and occult practices. The Philippine News Agency also reported in October 2025 that Bishop Renato Mayugba called for restoring the spiritual meaning of All Saints' Eve through prayer and remembering the saints, rather than focusing on ghosts and demons. But it would be wrong to turn these statements into a single position for all churches and Christian denominations; there are differences in interpretation and practice, and some religious groups take a more reserved stance toward the celebration. Third: What do the rabbis say? Does Judaism reject Halloween? In the American Jewish community, there is another debate about the limits of taking part in occasions with non-Jewish roots. Chabad.org published an article by Rabbi Tzvi Freeman titled "Should Jews Celebrate Halloween?", comparing the occasion with the Jewish holiday of Purim, when participants wear costumes and exchange gifts and food, while stressing the different religious background and meaning of the two occasions. Taking another direction, Rabbi David Z. Vaisberg, writing on the Reform Judaism website, discussed treating Halloween as a secular social occasion, as many Americans see it, while keeping Jewish values in mind. Rabbi Michael Broyde, in an analysis published by Canopy Forum in December 2021, discussed objections to taking part in Halloween based on Jewish law, and how the occasion's transformation into a secular celebration may affect how it is judged. So it is not correct to say that all rabbis forbid Halloween, nor to claim that all of them permit it. Positions vary by religious authority, interpretation and the nature of participation. Fourth: Is Halloween really an ancient pagan festival? Historical studies link Halloween's roots to ancient European traditions, including the Celtic festival of Samhain, and it later became tied to All Saints' Eve in the Christian tradition. Its modern form in the United States has developed into a widespread occasion that includes costumes, pumpkin carving, children collecting candy, and commercial parties. But there is an important difference between knowing an occasion's historical roots and judging everyone who takes part in it today. Historical origin alone does not necessarily tell us how each participant understands the occasion, or whether they consider it a religious ritual or a social activity. Here many people make a common mistake: they reduce a complex history to a single sentence, then build on it a sweeping judgment of millions of people. Fifth: What about our children in American schools? For Arab and Muslim families in New York, the matter is not only a religious debate but a practical situation parents face every year. A child may want to wear a costume because classmates are taking part, and a parent may fear the child will feel isolated if the family refuses. On the other hand, the family may see abstaining from the celebration as part of its religious commitment and of raising its children with their identity. The solution does not require mocking others or making children afraid of their classmates. Parents can explain their religious position clearly, listen to the child's questions, and distinguish between respecting neighbors and taking part in all of their traditions. They should also pay attention to safety in the streets, costumes that block vision, and candy that is unwrapped or of unknown origin. A child can learn to respect different religions and cultures, even if the family chooses not to take part in a particular occasion. Sixth: The final verdict: what do the three religions tell us? After reviewing the published positions, the picture looks like this: In Islam: Egypt's Dar al-Ifta permits social participation within limits, while some scholars reject taking part in Halloween activities. In Christianity: some church voices accept a moderate celebration while warning against glorifying evil and violence, and others call for refocusing on the occasion's spiritual meaning. In Judaism: some rabbis reject participation for religious and historical reasons, while others accept treating Halloween as a secular social occasion within limits. The main conclusion is that talk of "the ruling of the three religions" must not become a misleading generalization; within each religion there are different authorities, interpretations and positions. As for a family's practical decision, it requires understanding the source of the fatwa, or the church or Jewish position it follows, and knowing the nature of the activity the child will take part in. The question we leave open for discussion: is Halloween in America just a social celebration that has lost much of its religious meaning, or are its historical roots enough to make some families refuse to take part however its outward forms change? Do you agree with children taking part in Halloween, or do you think it is better to stay away from it to preserve religious identity? Why? Share your view, while respecting others' right to differ. Report by Ahmad Mourad, a journalist based in New York Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[November 1: The Epic of Algerian Sovereignty and the Memory of a Nation That Forged Its Freedom Through Sacrifice]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12899/November-1%3A-The-Epic-of-Algerian-Sovereignty-and-the-Memory-of-a-Nation-That-Forged-Its-Freedom-Through-Sacrifice?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12899/November-1%3A-The-Epic-of-Algerian-Sovereignty-and-the-Memory-of-a-Nation-That-Forged-Its-Freedom-Through-Sacrifice?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[O page on which survival was inscribedby the fire and light of the proud ones' struggleO heroism that sweeps across the worldinspired by everlasting values November 1 is a date whose memory is renewed every year, the title of a decisive stage that reshaped and sharpened Algeria's relationship with itself and with the world, and declared that the will of peoples, however unbalanced the scales of power around them, remains able to seize its right to freedom and sovereignty. On November 1, 1954, Algeria chose to open the road to its independence with a historic decision that embodied the maturity of the national movement and proved that liberation was the project of a nation whose features had formed in the conscience of its people over decades of resistance and steadfastness. The outbreak of the Algerian revolution came as the culmination of a long path of confrontation with the weight of French colonialism and the bitterness of oppression, which since the occupation of Algeria in 1830 had sought to subjugate its land, dismantle its social fabric and confiscate the pillars of its national identity. Yet attempts at erasure and subjugation failed to uproot Algerians' bond with their land and identity; resistance remained present in many forms, from popular uprisings and armed confrontations to the national movement and political and cultural work, until the moment when a historic conviction took shape that recovering sovereignty required moving the struggle to a new stage. November 1 was a declaration of decisive national will and the opening of a stage in which freedom became a clear goal and independence a political horizon beyond compromise. The Declaration of November 1, 1954, carried a complete vision of the revolution's aims and means, and laid down its political reference by calling for the restoration of national sovereignty, the unity of Algerian territory, and the building of an independent, sovereign Algerian state. It also expressed the revolution's leaders' awareness of the importance of explaining the Algerian cause to public opinion at home and abroad, and of linking the struggle on the ground with political and diplomatic work. The true strength of the revolution lay in its ability to turn aspirations for liberation into a unifying national cause. From every corner of the country, the fuse of will met the gunpowder of an unbridled desire for independence, and the knights and champions of the resistance bore the burden of a struggle that lasted nearly eight years of hardship and deprivation. They faced arrest, torture, displacement and destruction, and gave lives and sacrifices that made freedom the fruit of an arduous path that refused passing concessions and political handouts. The unity of the people with the National Liberation Army and the National Liberation Front was one of the main pillars that gave the revolution its ability to endure, despite the vast gap in resources and means. Alongside the confrontation at home, the revolution waged a broad political and diplomatic battle to internationalize the Algerian cause and win recognition of the people's right to self-determination. Its leaders understood that national liberation does not stop at establishing a presence on the ground, but also requires addressing the world's conscience, refuting colonial narratives and building outside support for a just cause. The Algerian revolution thus became linked to its Arab and African surroundings and to liberation movements around the world, its cause became part of the international anti-colonial path, and it stood as proof that national sovereignty is an inherent right of peoples, not a privilege that dominant powers grant or withhold according to their interests. This path, with all its steadfastness, sacrifices and political shifts, led to Algeria regaining its independence on July 5, 1962, after paying the heavy price of colonial repression to recover its national decision. Since that date, the country has entered the stage of building the independent state, carrying a revolutionary legacy and a historic responsibility: preserving sovereignty, protecting the unity of the national territory, and securing Algeria's place among nations on the basis of independent decision-making and respect for peoples' right to self-determination. Loyalty to the message of November requires grasping its historical and national dimensions, and linking pride in the past with a responsible awareness of the demands of the present. States that rest on their history draw on their glories and take from them confidence in their ability to face challenges, develop their institutions, strengthen their economies, consolidate their social unity and expand their contribution regionally and internationally. The sovereignty Algerians won through sacrifice remains tied to the ability of successive generations to preserve independence in its full sense, which includes independent decision-making, strong institutions, the means of development, and the protection of national interests within relations built on mutual respect and cooperation. November is the dawn that instilled in the proud and dignified the certainty of achieving glory and greatness, and gave itself a lasting power to remind Algerians that nations are built by will and protected by responsibility when their sons and daughters unite around their highest interests. It is a golden pledge renewed with every generation: that the sacrifices of the martyrs remain present in the national consciousness, and that the freedom the people seized remains the foundation of every project aimed at Algeria's prosperity and standing. On the 72nd anniversary of the outbreak of the glorious Algerian revolution, Algeria stands before its history with the pride of a calm yet revolutionary people, risen on its boiling blood, who knew the harshness of the road to independence and proved that the will to be free is stronger than attempts at subjugation. November 1 will remain a shining page in the nation's record, a witness to Algerians' ability to turn sheer suffering into bloody resistance, resistance into decisive revolution, and revolution into an independent state. And the record of glory born from the womb of hardship and every kind of torment will remain bound to the epic of a people who chose to write their destiny with their own hands and fists, to make sovereignty and national dignity two firm pillars of their march toward the future, and who resolved that Algeria shall live free and proud. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A Tent on the Edge of the Storm]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12898/A-Tent-on-the-Edge-of-the-Storm?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12898/A-Tent-on-the-Edge-of-the-Storm?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[On a dusty night, the boom of thunder besieges me and flashes of lightning chase me. They pierce the pores of my small tent, sever its ties and threaten its corners. Tent poles shake as if locked in a fierce fight with nature, followed by whirlwinds and gales that sweep the whole place, trying to tear away my tent's resistance. But it murmurs through its edges: either victory, or lifting off with no direction and no map. Pieces of stone fly from the top of the rubble when the winds of the past blow, and the cruelty of nature and of time meet at once. There is no escape, and no fighting back helps, except turning to the Lord of creation... Am I really still on the land of the calamity? Was this rubble once a house that held my family between its banks? Was it a witness to times of joy and sorrow, and the source of my inspiration? A year ago I stood at the threshold of my balcony, delighting my eyes with falling raindrops followed by hailstones from the clouds. How beautiful they were as they wiped the dust of a lifetime from the edge of ruin, as if the window were the common ground between the one who sees and what is seen! As if the rain were washing what was left of clay, sand and homeland... I closed the window of my joy and hurried down with my family to the garden, where we wrote our names in the hail. My God, how sweet those moments were, when hail turns into letters and words, into the heart's blood of the lover who writes them, and into joy to come... We took pictures to keep in the file of warm family memories. Then the soil embraced the hailstones and they vanished after a short while, and the names melted into the sand of my home. So I carry them to write a new story with them, and a unique, central picture on which our names gathered in several languages in 2014, to which I added words last June as I welcomed my fortieth year in this universe... a picture that brings together three birth dates. Perhaps I should tell you that my lines carry its meaning, its purpose and its depth: Ghada: letters that gathered clay and snow between them..a vessel that held this mixture, and how cruel the hours of ripening...If sorrow could be built, I would raise the tallest building and tower...And yet...I wait for joy like a wild horse with no bridle and no saddle...If the world closes in on me, you remain the sail and I the wave... I gathered more hailstones, placed them on a piece of plastic and took another silent picture, and added to it words made of defiance, hope and waiting, titled "I Return to You": I return to you... carrying longing, giving you my heart and my days, all of me resolve...a dialogue of soul and body together... consensus and confirmation in the laws of love...There is no escape from you and no fleeing; the meeting is certain...and if in distance there is connection and resolve,the snow will melt, the meadow will bloom, and how fragrant the narcissus in March... Now winter has become a heavy burden on my shoulders. In it we check on, and miss, many things, the first of them the loss of shelter and of warm feelings. The hail melted, the house vanished and hope failed, and in their place came pain and the throes of dying. Only the picture and the words remain, in dialogue with the cruelty of nature and the steadfastness of the sad tent... Ghada Ayesh Khader, 2026 Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[After the U.S. Elections, "The Drums of War Are Beating Again": Is a Third Confrontation with Iran Near?]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12897/After-the-U.S.-Elections%2C-%22The-Drums-of-War-Are-Beating-Again%22%3A-Is-a-Third-Confrontation-with-Iran-Near%3F?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12897/After-the-U.S.-Elections%2C-%22The-Drums-of-War-Are-Beating-Again%22%3A-Is-a-Third-Confrontation-with-Iran-Near%3F?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[The possibility of renewed military confrontation between the United States and Israel on one side and Iran on the other is no longer just a hypothetical scenario in security and strategic calculations. It has become tied to a set of political, military and regional shifts that could push toward a new round of conflict. In this context, the hypothesis emerges that the post-election period may be a suitable time to put the military option back on the table, amid talk of American and Israeli preparations to rearrange the tools of confrontation. Talk of a third round of war with Iran stems not only from the possibility of escalation on the ground, but from the nature of the strategic conflict between the parties, the continuing dispute over Iran's nuclear program, Tehran's regional influence, and the equations of deterrence and security in the Middle East. Where is the confrontation heading? Reports published on October 22, 2026, indicate that Washington and Tel Aviv have prepared plans to resume military strikes on Iran after the U.S. midterm elections scheduled for November 3, 2026. Reports also spoke of intensified military exercises and operational preparations, and of discussions of possible targets including nuclear facilities, energy, and the missile and drone arsenal. These data reinforce the seriousness of the scenario of resumed war. The electoral timing is especially important; the U.S. administration appears to be seeking to avoid further economic and political fallout from the war before the elections, especially amid rising energy costs and their impact on American voters. Postponing any military decision until after the elections could therefore give Washington wider political room to act and reduce the impact of direct confrontation on domestic electoral calculations. At the same time, American calculations cannot be separated from the Israeli position. The Israeli government sees Iran's continued nuclear and missile capabilities as a long-term strategic challenge, and seeks to prevent Tehran from rebuilding its military capabilities and expanding its regional influence. From this standpoint, Tel Aviv may see resumed military operations as a chance to complete the goals not achieved in previous rounds and to reshape the regional deterrence equation. Why the next round could be more destructive The danger of any new confrontation lies in the possibility that it moves from targeting military and nuclear capabilities to a wider set of targets, including economic infrastructure, energy and vital facilities. Reports circulating about the American and Israeli plans speak of intensive operations targeting strategic sectors, which could make the war's consequences go beyond Iran and Israel to reach the Gulf states and the regional and global economic system. Iran is also preparing wider response options if the attacks resume, raising the likelihood that the confrontation turns into a multi-front regional conflict. Here the Strait of Hormuz stands out as a strategic passage for global energy trade, along with the possibility of attacks on interests and facilities tied to the parties involved in the war. Thus the danger of a third round is not tied only to the scale of the military strikes exchanged, but to the possibility that what remains of the rules of engagement collapses, that the circle of parties involved widens, and that the cost of confrontation rises for regional economies, especially states caught between security commitments to Washington and the risks of an Iranian response. After the elections does not necessarily mean before the war Current indicators allow us to say that the region stands at a highly sensitive stage, and that the possibility of resumed military confrontation after the U.S. elections is now seriously present in strategic calculations. But the move from planning and preparation to a decision for war remains subject to complex political, military and diplomatic calculations. The central question is no longer only whether Washington and Tel Aviv are able to launch a new round of attacks, but whether they are able to control its course and outcomes. A war may begin with an American and Israeli decision, but it will not necessarily end according to the calculations of those who made it. A third round, if it breaks out, may not be just a continuation of the previous rounds, but a turning point in the structure of the regional conflict and in the equations of security, energy and influence in the Middle East. The drums of war beating in Washington and Tel Aviv therefore reflect not only new military readiness, but an open strategic crisis whose exit may cost far more than its entry. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA["Between Polls and Ballot Boxes": The Republican Scenario That Could Upend the 2026 Congressional Elections]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12896/%22Between-Polls-and-Ballot-Boxes%22%3A-The-Republican-Scenario-That-Could-Upend-the-2026-Congressional-Elections?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12896/%22Between-Polls-and-Ballot-Boxes%22%3A-The-Republican-Scenario-That-Could-Upend-the-2026-Congressional-Elections?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[As the U.S. midterm elections scheduled for November 3, 2026, approach, the battle for control of Congress appears open to contradictory scenarios. Democrats lead in a number of Senate races, while Republicans could keep their majorities in both chambers if the polling errors seen in previous U.S. elections are repeated. This raises a strategic question: do the polls really reflect voters' leanings, or could they be hiding an electoral shift that gives the Republican Party a chance to upend expectations? Polls do not decide elections Current indicators show Democrats ahead in a number of swing states, but this lead does not look decisive, especially since the gaps in most races fall within the statistical margin of error. Democrats need a net gain of four seats from Republicans to control the Senate, which currently has 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats. The latest polls show Democrat Talarico leading in Texas with 50% to Republican Paxton's 45%, Democrat El-Sayed leading in Michigan with 51% to Rogers's 45%, and Jackson leading in Maine with 51% to 44% for Republican Sen. Susan Collins. In Georgia, Democrat Jon Ossoff leads with 55% to his Republican opponent's 40%. In Iowa, the race looks closer, with Democrat Turek ahead 45% to 43% over Republican Hinson. In Ohio, a poll of the special election shows candidates Brown and Husted tied at 47% each. In Nebraska, Republican Ricketts leads independent Osborn by one point, while Florida leans more Republican, with Moody ahead of Democrat Nixon 51% to 43%. But these numbers must be read with caution: the Echelon polls were conducted between October 16 and 23, 2026, with margins of error of roughly 5 to 6 points, leaving many of these races open to several outcomes. The Republican scenario: when the polls are wrong On the other hand, there is an electoral scenario that could turn the calculations upside down: the possibility that the polls have once again underestimated Republican support, as happened in previous election cycles. According to historical data in the election figures, early-October polls underestimated Republican strength in 14 of 16 election cycles since 1994, with an average error of about four points. If this pattern repeats in 2026, Democrats could face an unexpected electoral surprise. Under this scenario, a shift of two to four points in Republicans' favor could give them 53 Senate seats to the Democrats' 47, with Michigan moving into the Republican column and the party holding on to its core seats. In the House, a polling error of more than three points could give Republicans 218 seats or more, enough to keep the majority. This means the Republican Party could keep control of both chambers, despite current indicators giving Democrats an edge in a number of races. Turnout: the deciding factor The electoral battle is not only about the voting intentions shown in polls, but about the makeup of the electorate that actually reaches the ballot box. Turnout rates, the distribution of early voting, and the two parties' ability to mobilize their bases will be more decisive than the narrow numerical gaps in last-minute polls. This matters because midterm elections often become a political referendum on the performance of the sitting administration, but they also reflect the opposition's ability to turn political discontent into actual turnout. So a Democratic lead in the polls does not necessarily guarantee a breakthrough in Congress, just as a Republican decline in some states does not mean their bases have lost the ability to mobilize. Congress between possible change and a surprise of continuity The most important scenario in the 2026 elections is not only that Democrats might regain control of one or both chambers of Congress, but that Republicans might keep their legislative dominance despite political pressure and polls showing their opponents ahead. If Republicans keep their majorities in both chambers, President Donald Trump will gain wider political and legislative room to carry out his domestic and foreign agenda, while Democrats' ability to exercise legislative oversight and block some presidential policies will shrink. If Democrats win a majority, the U.S. administration will enter a new phase of political balances, and perhaps institutional confrontation with Congress. In the end, the November 3, 2026, elections look like a double test of the credibility of the polls and of both parties' ability to mobilize voters. Between an undecided Democratic lead and a possible Republican surprise, the real battle remains at the ballot box, not in the polling tables. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zelensky Ready for Direct Peace Talks in Turkey to End Conflict]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12895/Zelensky-Ready-for-Direct-Peace-Talks-in-Turkey-to-End-Conflict?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12895/Zelensky-Ready-for-Direct-Peace-Talks-in-Turkey-to-End-Conflict?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:00:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Volodymyr Zelensky has announced a willingness to participate in a direct meeting with Vladimir Putin in Turkey. The proposed talks aim to address a potential ceasefire, security frameworks, and the status of territories currently under occupation. While open to dialogue, Zelensky remains firm that Ukraine will not make territorial concessions regarding the Donbas or Crimea, emphasizing that no international agreements regarding the nation's future can be made without its direct involvement.The initiative for these high-level discussions stems from a perceived need for direct communication between the primary decision-makers. Zelensky noted that previous attempts at negotiations involving various delegations and technical teams have not yet succeeded in bringing the ongoing conflict to an end. By meeting with Putin directly, Zelensky believes they can address critical issues that lower-level officials are unable to resolve. The choice of Turkey as a venue is significant, as Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has maintained active communication with both sides, making him a central figure in facilitating these diplomatic efforts.Among the primary objectives for a potential meeting in Turkey is the establishment of a formal ceasefire along the front lines. Zelensky emphasized that any such agreement must include a robust mechanism to monitor compliance, ensuring that all parties adhere to the terms. Additionally, the discussions would need to cover long-term security guarantees for Ukraine to prevent future escalations, as well as plans for the extensive reconstruction required across the country. However, the boundaries of these negotiations are clear: Zelensky stated that recognizing Crimea as part of another state or handing over the Donbas would be a violation of the national constitution and is therefore off the table.The diplomatic landscape is also shifting toward upcoming international gatherings. There is significant discussion regarding the G20 summit scheduled for December in Miami. Zelensky indicated that while an official invitation from Washington has not yet been received, there are indications that Donald Trump might extend one. Such an invitation could be part of a broader effort to launch a new peace initiative. Reports suggest that the American administration, including figures like Marco Rubio, is weighing the potential impact of Zelensky’s participation in the summit. While Putin has also been invited, the Kremlin has previously been hesitant about a side-meeting between the two figures at such events.Zelensky has been vocal about the principle that Ukraine’s destiny must be decided by its own people. He rejected the notion that third parties or other global powers could negotiate the country's sovereignty or borders in its absence. This stance comes as the conflict enters its fifth year, a duration that has exceeded initial international expectations regarding the resilience of the local defense. Zelensky pointed out that despite early claims that the country would fall quickly, it has maintained its sovereignty and continues to demand a seat at every table where its future is discussed. The focus remains on achieving a fair and lasting peace that respects international law and territorial integrity. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Donald Trump Leads Intensive Campaign Rallies in Final Push Before Election Day]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12894/Donald-Trump-Leads-Intensive-Campaign-Rallies-in-Final-Push-Before-Election-Day?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12894/Donald-Trump-Leads-Intensive-Campaign-Rallies-in-Final-Push-Before-Election-Day?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:50:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Donald Trump is engaging in a series of high-energy rallies across several key states, including Florida, Iowa, and Kansas, in a final effort to mobilize voters ahead of the upcoming elections. As national attention focuses on the struggle for control of the legislature, the campaign trail has become a battleground for competing visions of the nation's economic and social future.With the election just days away, Donald Trump has intensified his travel schedule, visiting regions that have historically shown strong support for his party. These visits to states like Florida and Iowa suggest a strategic effort to solidify the base in areas that are becoming increasingly competitive. During these events, the focus has shifted toward highlighting differences in policy regarding trade, border security, and government spending. Addressing crowds of supporters, Donald Trump emphasized a vision of national prosperity while warning that opposition policies could lead to economic instability for many families.The current political climate is heavily influenced by domestic concerns, particularly the rising cost of living. Voters have expressed ongoing frustration over the prices of essential goods, including fuel and groceries. In response, campaign rhetoric has leaned into these anxieties, with Donald Trump framing the election as a choice between economic growth and what he describes as a period of national decline. To further energize the electorate, the campaign has utilized various platforms, including large-scale physical rallies and digital “tele-rallies” reaching voters in critical states such as Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.On the other side of the aisle, prominent figures like Hakeem Jeffries and Barack Obama have also been active, making their own final appeals to the public. National polling data suggests a very close race, with some indicators pointing toward a potential shift in legislative control. This possibility has heightened the stakes for both parties, as a change in the majority would significantly impact the ability to pass new laws and conduct administrative oversight. Hakeem Jeffries expressed high confidence in his party's momentum, suggesting that the public is ready for a different approach to governance.Unexpected developments have also emerged in specific state races. In Michigan, a notable endorsement occurred when Haley Stevens threw her support behind Mike Rogers, a move that sparked significant discussion within political circles. Meanwhile, in Alaska, legal challenges regarding the certification of election results were addressed by the courts, ensuring that the voting process remains on track despite administrative disputes. These local incidents underscore the volatile and highly contested nature of this election cycle.Ultimately, the results of this election will be seen as a significant indicator of public sentiment regarding the nation's current direction. Historically, the party currently holding power faces challenges during these mid-cycle votes, and this year appears to be no exception. As voters head to the polls, the outcome will decide the fate of major policy issues, ranging from healthcare and reproductive rights to taxation and immigration reform. The decisions made at the ballot box will resonate far beyond the halls of government, affecting the daily lives and wallets of citizens across the country. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Oil Prices Drop Sharply as Donald Trump Shifts Focus Toward Diplomacy with Iran]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12893/Oil-Prices-Drop-Sharply-as-Donald-Trump-Shifts-Focus-Toward-Diplomacy-with-Iran?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12893/Oil-Prices-Drop-Sharply-as-Donald-Trump-Shifts-Focus-Toward-Diplomacy-with-Iran?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Global energy markets experienced a notable shift on Monday morning as crude oil prices fell by more than 3 per cent. This decline follows signals from Donald Trump regarding a preference for diplomatic discussions with Iran, which has temporarily eased international concerns over potential military escalations and supply chain disruptions in the Middle East.The two primary benchmarks for global oil showed significant downward movement during early trading sessions. Brent crude, which serves as a price reference for two-thirds of the world's oil, was valued at $110 per barrel. Meanwhile, West Texas Intermediate, the main gauge for US crude, saw its price drop to approximately $100.90 per barrel. These figures represent a cooling off from recent highs, as investors react to the possibility of a non-military resolution to ongoing regional tensions.The shift in market sentiment is largely attributed to reports of a telephone conversation between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. During this exchange, it was indicated that there is a desire to provide more time for diplomatic efforts with Tehran before any consideration of further military action. This stance was echoed by Marco Rubio, who noted that while the situation remains monitored, a diplomatic resolution is the preferred path. These statements have provided a much-needed reprieve for a market that had been bracing for increased volatility following recent events in the Gulf region.In recent days, the maritime environment has been a source of anxiety for energy traders. Reports surfaced of vessels being targeted near the Strait of Hormuz and along the coast of Saudi Arabia. Such incidents typically drive prices higher due to the risk premium associated with securing oil shipments through vital waterways. However, the news of an Iranian delegation arriving in Qatar for discussions with international mediators has offered hope that a framework for stability might be established. These negotiations are seen as a critical step in de-escalating a situation that recently pushed oil prices to a six-month peak.Financial analysts suggest that while the current dip is significant, the overall market remains sensitive to geopolitical developments. Over the past month, oil prices had surged by double digits—between 12 and 15 per cent—driven by fears of conflict. While diplomacy is now at the forefront, experts believe prices may remain relatively high through the end of the year. Factors such as fluctuating freight costs, limited tanker availability, and a recovery in import demand from major economies like China continue to provide a floor for energy prices. For now, the global community is closely watching the progress of these diplomatic channels, hoping that a peaceful agreement will ensure the steady flow of energy resources and stabilize the global economy. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zohran Mamdani Threatens Legal Action to Stop ICE from Using City Parking Lots]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12892/Zohran-Mamdani-Threatens-Legal-Action-to-Stop-ICE-from-Using-City-Parking-Lots?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12892/Zohran-Mamdani-Threatens-Legal-Action-to-Stop-ICE-from-Using-City-Parking-Lots?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Zohran Mamdani has issued a formal warning to federal authorities, threatening legal steps to prevent immigration agents from using New York City-owned parking lots as staging areas for their operations. This move comes amid rising tensions between local officials and federal immigration enforcement regarding the use of public property for surveillance and raids.The dispute centers on allegations that agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have been gathering in municipal parking lots in Queens and the Bronx to prepare for enforcement actions. In a letter addressed to Markwayne Mullin and other high-ranking officials, Zohran Mamdani stated that these activities violate a local order established earlier this year. The letter characterizes the use of city property for federal immigration enforcement as unauthorized and illegal, asserting that such actions endanger residents and create an atmosphere of fear within the community.According to the communication sent on Monday, agents have reportedly been seen at a parking lot in Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx and near Flushing Meadows Corona Park in Queens. The Queens location is particularly sensitive as it sits adjacent to a preschool and the New York Hall of Science. Zohran Mamdani emphasized that city property should remain accessible and safe for all residents, rather than being repurposed as a base for federal law enforcement tactics that many in the city oppose.This legal threat is the latest development in a series of disagreements regarding how federal agencies operate within the city. The friction intensified following an incident in October where a man was shot and injured during an immigration operation. Since then, local leadership has taken a firmer stance against federal presence on city-owned land. While federal representatives argue that their presence in public parking lots is a standard and legal practice for law enforcement, local officials maintain that the city has the right to control how its own assets are used.To reinforce this position, the city has issued new guidelines to employees within the Parks Department. These instructions direct staff to deny entry to federal agents in non-public areas of city lots unless they present a judicial warrant. Employees were also advised to avoid physical or verbal confrontations but to report any unauthorized sightings to city legal representatives. This administrative step aims to monitor and limit the ability of federal agents to use municipal infrastructure without explicit local consent.Advocacy groups, such as Hands Off NYC, have played a significant role in documenting these sightings. They have provided photographic evidence and license plate numbers of vehicles suspected to be used by immigration agents. These groups argue that the city must use every available resource to ensure that public spaces are not used for activities that disrupt the lives of immigrant neighbors. While the city has limited control over private parking garages, Zohran Mamdani has also encouraged private owners to refrain from renting space to federal agencies for enforcement purposes. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New York City Lawmakers to Review Winter Snow Removal Plans and Transparency Proposals]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12891/New-York-City-Lawmakers-to-Review-Winter-Snow-Removal-Plans-and-Transparency-Proposals?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12891/New-York-City-Lawmakers-to-Review-Winter-Snow-Removal-Plans-and-Transparency-Proposals?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — New York City officials are shifting their focus to winter preparations as the sanitation committee prepares to scrutinize the city's snow removal strategies and a new transparency bill. As the autumn leaves continue to fall across the five boroughs, city lawmakers are already looking ahead to the challenges of the coming winter season. The City Council’s sanitation committee has scheduled a meeting for Monday to conduct a thorough review of how the city prepares for significant winter storms. This oversight comes in the wake of last year’s severe weather, which saw two major blizzards leave streets and sidewalks buried under heavy snow, followed by extended periods of freezing temperatures that kept ice and snow piles on the ground for weeks.A key focus of the upcoming discussions will be a new legislative proposal aimed at increasing public accountability regarding snow clearing. The bill would mandate that the Department of Sanitation maintain and publish historical records of snowplowing activities on its public-facing website, PlowNYC. While the current version of the website allows residents to see when their specific block was last cleared in real-time, it does not offer access to past data. Supporters of the bill argue that having a historical record is essential for understanding how resources are distributed across the city.Ty Hankerson, who is sponsoring the legislation, emphasized that transparency is vital for New Yorkers during and after major weather events. In a supporting memo, Hankerson noted that the distribution of snowplows is often a point of contention among residents, with some neighborhoods feeling they receive less attention than others. By making this data publicly available to everyone, the city aims to address these concerns with hard facts and ensure that snow removal efforts are equitable and efficient for all communities, regardless of their location.The timing of this hearing is particularly relevant as federal weather forecasters provide their outlook for the months ahead. Experts are predicting a winter that may be warmer than the historical average for New York City, a trend influenced by the El Niño weather pattern. El Niño is characterized by the warming of waters in the Pacific Ocean, which can alter weather systems across North America. However, meteorologists caution that even in a generally warmer winter, the potential for a massive, disruptive snowstorm remains high. The memory of last winter’s brutal cold and heavy accumulation serves as a reminder that the city must be ready for any scenario. By reviewing protocols now, lawmakers hope to avoid the logistical hurdles that left some streets impassable for long stretches earlier this year. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Iran Signals Potential for Broad Retaliation as Peace Efforts Continue]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12890/Iran-Signals-Potential-for-Broad-Retaliation-as-Peace-Efforts-Continue?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12890/Iran-Signals-Potential-for-Broad-Retaliation-as-Peace-Efforts-Continue?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 12:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — In a period of heightened regional friction, Mojtaba Khamenei has signaled that any military action against Iran will be met with a response that transcends traditional boundaries. While international mediators from Qatar are actively working in Tehran to broker a path toward peace and prevent a wider conflict with the United States, the rhetoric from military and political circles remains focused on high-level deterrence and strategic readiness.According to recent reports, Mojtaba Khamenei convened a high-stakes meeting with top military officials to outline new strategic directives. The emphasis was placed on maintaining "maximum deterrence," which includes preparing the nation’s armed forces for an immediate and effective counter-attack. The directives specify that such a response would not be limited by geography, suggesting that Iranian operations could extend far beyond the immediate conflict zones if the country is targeted again.On the diplomatic front, senior representatives from Qatar have been conducting extensive discussions in Tehran. These talks are aimed at reviving ceasefire frameworks and establishing a stable dialogue. Central to these negotiations is a communication from JD Vance addressed to Mohsen Rezaei. While the specific contents of the correspondence remain under wraps, it is understood that the dialogue touches upon nuclear transparency, international monitoring, and the status of enriched materials. Conversely, Donald Trump has suggested the communication was primarily concerned with the facilitation of medical supplies into the region, highlighting a discrepancy in how the diplomatic overtures are being interpreted.The baseline for negotiations from the Iranian perspective continues to center on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has proposed restoring access to this critical waterway in exchange for a return to the agreements established in the June memorandum of understanding. Key demands from officials in Tehran include the removal of maritime blockades on Iranian ports, the granting of waivers on oil sanctions, and a general cessation of hostilities in regional conflict zones, including Lebanon. Despite these proposals, local media outlets suggest that the window for a diplomatic breakthrough may be narrow, with some editorials warning that the threat of expanded fighting remains a significant concern.The situation in the Strait of Hormuz remains particularly volatile. Reports indicate that the maritime corridor has seen a sharp decline in traffic, with transits dropping nearly 70 percent compared to pre-conflict levels. Recent incidents have exacerbated these tensions, including reports of explosive devices being attached to tankers and drone strikes affecting local fishing vessels near Qeshm island. While US military officials, such as Brad Cooper, have asserted that their presence provides necessary security for global oil shipments, Iranian military spokesmen like Mohammad Akraminia have warned that any further "adventurism" will inevitably cause the flames of war to spread across a much larger area.Economic and political consequences are also at the forefront of the discussion. Following comments by Friedrich Merz regarding the staggering costs of the conflict for Europe, Iranian officials like Abbas Araghchi and Mohsen Rezaei have criticized international stances, suggesting that those who supported military escalations must now face the resulting fallout. Meanwhile, voices such as Chris Murphy have expressed deep concern over the potential for devastating escalation, arguing that military solutions may not achieve the desired negotiating outcomes and could instead lead to a prolonged and painful cycle of violence for all parties involved. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[UN Security Council Deadlocked Over Western Sahara Peacekeeping Mission Extension]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12889/UN-Security-Council-Deadlocked-Over-Western-Sahara-Peacekeeping-Mission-Extension?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12889/UN-Security-Council-Deadlocked-Over-Western-Sahara-Peacekeeping-Mission-Extension?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 12:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — The United Nations Security Council has failed to reach an agreement on extending the peacekeeping mission in Western Sahara, leaving the region's future in a state of uncertainty after competing resolutions from the United States and Russia were both rejected. This deadlock puts the long-standing monitoring mission at risk of expiration, potentially shifting the balance of a conflict that has lasted for decades.The United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara, known as MINURSO, faces an immediate crisis as its mandate is set to expire. In a series of votes on Friday, the Security Council was unable to find common ground. A proposal led by the United States received 11 votes in favor from the 15-member council, including support from France and the United Kingdom. However, Russia used its veto power to block the resolution. Following this, a separate draft presented by Russia also failed, as it could not secure the necessary nine votes for adoption, receiving only two votes in favor while the rest of the council either voted against it or abstained.Western Sahara, a territory in northwest Africa and a former Spanish colony, has been the center of a long-running dispute. Morocco considers the region an integral part of its sovereign territory and has proposed an autonomy plan. On the other side, the Polisario Front, which receives support from Algeria, seeks the establishment of an independent state. MINURSO was originally established in 1991 to oversee a ceasefire and organize a referendum to decide the territory's future. However, that vote has never taken place due to deep disagreements over who is eligible to cast a ballot.The failed U.S. resolution sought to extend the mission for another year but included significant changes. It proposed removing the word "referendum" from the mission's title and suggested that the autonomy plan proposed by Morocco should be the sole basis for future political negotiations. Under this framework, the region would manage its own internal affairs while remaining under Moroccan sovereignty. Mike Waltz, representing the U.S. at the UN, argued that the referendum process had been stalled for too long and that a new approach was necessary to move forward.Russia’s representative, Vassily Nebenzia, explained the veto by stating that the U.S. proposal was biased and unfairly favored one side of the conflict. He emphasized that the Security Council should not move to predetermine matters of sovereignty through such resolutions. Russia instead advocated for a straightforward renewal of the existing mission without the controversial changes to its mandate. The lack of consensus has left the 155 military personnel currently serving in the mission in a state of limbo. The mission, which costs approximately $62 million annually, is essential for maintaining the ceasefire that has been strained since 2020.The reactions to the UN stalemate have been sharp and varied. Morocco expressed that if the mission is not renewed, UN personnel and equipment should prepare to leave the territory, suggesting the issue be removed from the Security Council's agenda entirely. Meanwhile, Sidi Omar, speaking for the Polisario Front, welcomed the Russian veto, arguing that the U.S. plan would have stripped the Sahrawi people of their right to self-determination. International aid organizations, including Oxfam, have warned that the withdrawal of MINURSO would remove a vital de-escalation tool, potentially leading to increased instability and a return to more intense conflict in a region where tens of thousands of people already live in refugee camps. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zelenskyy Praises U.S. Decision on 500 Patriot Missiles but Flags Delivery Delay Concerns]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12888/Zelenskyy-Praises-U.S.-Decision-on-500-Patriot-Missiles-but-Flags-Delivery-Delay-Concerns?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12888/Zelenskyy-Praises-U.S.-Decision-on-500-Patriot-Missiles-but-Flags-Delivery-Delay-Concerns?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 12:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Volodymyr Zelenskyy has expressed gratitude toward the United States for authorizing a major sale of 500 Patriot missiles, a move seen as a significant boost to defense capabilities. However, Zelenskyy accompanied this praise with a serious warning, noting that the projected timeline for the delivery of these interceptors could span several years, leaving immediate security needs unaddressed. The U.S. State Department recently gave the green light for a $2.1 billion package involving Patriot PAC-3 interceptors. These missiles are highly sought after for their ability to neutralize incoming drones and ballistic missiles. While the agreement is a landmark in military cooperation, the logistics of production and shipment mean that the full batch might not reach its destination for a significant amount of time. Zelenskyy pointed out that while 500 interceptors represent a massive and effective defense shield, the "very soon" aspect is missing from the actual delivery schedule.The timing of this deal is particularly sensitive as winter approaches. Security officials have long emphasized the need for robust air defenses to protect the power grid and civilian infrastructure. In previous years, the energy network has been a primary target during the colder months, leading to widespread outages and humanitarian challenges. The fear is that a shortage of interceptors during the winter of 2026–2027 could lead to a particularly difficult period for the population if defenses are spread too thin. Zelenskyy mentioned that his administration has been waiting for official signatures from U.S. officials, including Pete Hegseth, to finalize shipments for both Patriot and NASAMS systems.To bridge the gap between the current need and future deliveries, Zelenskyy proposed a strategic solution to international partners. He suggested that countries with existing stockpiles of PAC-3 interceptors provide them to his forces immediately to handle the current winter threats. These partners could then replenish their own inventories later using the 500 missiles currently being manufactured under the new $2.1 billion contract. This "swap" approach, he argued, would ensure that active defense lines are maintained when the danger is highest, rather than waiting for new production lines to finish.The Patriot platform remains one of the most sophisticated defense technologies in the world. It is capable of tracking and destroying high-speed threats before they reach their targets. Most of these defense acquisitions are facilitated through specialized international initiatives, such as NATO’s Prioritised Requirements List, which helps allies coordinate the purchase of munitions from American manufacturers. Records show that by mid-2026, international allies had committed over $6 billion toward defense equipment via these schemes, highlighting the global scale of the effort to maintain regional stability. Despite the long-term promise of these deals, the immediate focus remains on securing enough ammunition to survive the coming months safely. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Candidates for New York Governor Make Final Campaign Pushes Across the City]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12887/Candidates-for-New-York-Governor-Make-Final-Campaign-Pushes-Across-the-City?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12887/Candidates-for-New-York-Governor-Make-Final-Campaign-Pushes-Across-the-City?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 12:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — As Election Day approaches, the race for the leadership of New York has entered its final and most intense phase. Kathy Hochul and Bruce Blakeman spent the weekend traversing the city’s boroughs, making their final appeals to voters on critical issues ranging from housing and childcare to tax reform and the cost of living. With early voting drawing to a close, both candidates are focused on mobilizing their supporters for a decisive turnout.With only days remaining before the polls officially close, the competition for the state’s highest office has seen a flurry of activity across New York City. On Saturday, both Kathy Hochul and Bruce Blakeman targeted key neighborhoods to solidify their platforms and address the primary concerns of residents. The visits come at a pivotal moment, as hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers have already participated in early voting, signaling a high level of engagement in this election cycle.Kathy Hochul focused her efforts on Brooklyn, appearing at the Lenox Road Baptist Church in East Flatbush. During the visit, the focus remained on social infrastructure and the cost of living. Addressing the congregation and local residents, the discussion centered on the necessity of expanding access to childcare and improving the state’s education system. However, the central theme was the ongoing housing crisis. It was argued that the only sustainable way to lower rents and make homeownership a reality for more people is to significantly increase the supply of available housing. There was a strong call to overcome local opposition to new developments, stressing that every resident deserves a stable and affordable place to live.On the other side of the city, Bruce Blakeman held a rally at Juniper Valley Park in Middle Village, Queens. The tone of this gathering was centered on economic change and tax relief. Critical of the current economic direction of the state, the message to supporters focused on the high cost of living that has driven many to consider leaving New York. A major campaign promise highlighted during the rally was a proposal to eliminate state income tax on the first $100,000 of income for joint filers. The argument presented was that New Yorkers need more money in their pockets to ensure that future generations can afford to stay and thrive in the state they call home.As the campaign trail heated up, the New York City Board of Elections released updated figures regarding voter participation. As of Friday evening, more than 468,000 ballots had already been cast through early voting. Brooklyn has emerged as the leader in turnout, with approximately 142,000 voters heading to the polls early, followed closely by Manhattan and Queens. These numbers suggest that the electorate is highly motivated, despite the diverging visions offered by the two main candidates. Sunday marks the final day for early voting, providing a last window for those wishing to avoid the potential crowds on Tuesday.The contrast between the two campaigns reflects a broader national conversation about the role of government in managing economic growth and social services. While one side emphasizes investment in public resources and housing supply, the other advocates for tax reductions and a shift in leadership to address affordability. As the city moves toward the final deadline, the energy on the ground remains high, with both sides aware that the results in the five boroughs will likely play a massive role in determining the ultimate winner of the race. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Daylight Saving Time Ends: Prepare for Sunsets Before 5 P.M. Across Major Cities]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12886/Daylight-Saving-Time-Ends%3A-Prepare-for-Sunsets-Before-5-P.M.-Across-Major-Cities?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12886/Daylight-Saving-Time-Ends%3A-Prepare-for-Sunsets-Before-5-P.M.-Across-Major-Cities?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 12:05:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Residents across the United States are preparing for a significant shift in their daily schedules as daylight saving time officially draws to a close on November 1. This annual transition means that millions of Americans will see the sun dip below the horizon before 5 p.m., marking a sudden and dramatic start to the colder, darker months of the year. The shift occurs as clocks “fall back” by one hour, effectively moving an hour of daylight from the evening to the morning. In 2026, this change lands on the earliest possible date, November 1, creating an abrupt transformation in the rhythm of evening life. For those living in major metropolitan hubs like New York City, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and Seattle, the first day of November will bring the first of many early sunsets, with the sky darkening well before the traditional end of the workday.While the change is uniform across most of the country, the impact varies by geography. In the northernmost parts of the United States, the loss of evening light is even more pronounced. For instance, in Caribou, Maine, the sun is expected to set as early as 4:16 p.m. on the first night of standard time. This makes it one of the earliest sunset locations in the contiguous United States. Conversely, those living in the southern states will enjoy a bit more evening light; residents in Miami and Houston will see sunsets closer to 5:30 p.m. and 5:40 p.m., respectively.It is important to note that not every part of the country participates in this biannual ritual. Hawaii and the majority of Arizona maintain a consistent time year-round and do not observe daylight saving time. Interestingly, the Navajo Nation within Arizona does follow the time change, creating a unique patchwork of time zones within the state. For the rest of the nation, however, the adjustment is a mandatory reminder of the changing seasons.Beyond the simple act of turning back the clock, the month of November heralds a natural shortening of days. The Northern Hemisphere has been gradually losing daylight since the summer solstice in June, and this trend will accelerate throughout the month. In cities like Seattle, the total amount of daily sunlight will decrease by more than 70 minutes between the start and end of November. This process continues until the winter solstice in late December, which stands as the shortest day of the year.Experts often point out that while the time change does not actually shorten the day, the psychological and physical impact of early darkness can be significant. It affects everything from commuting safety to energy consumption and seasonal moods. As the evening hours grow longer and darker, officials often remind the public to be more vigilant on the roads, as visibility decreases during peak travel times. The end of daylight saving time serves as a seasonal milestone, signaling that winter is truly on the horizon. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Oman Rescues 25 Crew Members from Burning Tanker in the Strait of Hormuz]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12885/Oman-Rescues-25-Crew-Members-from-Burning-Tanker-in-the-Strait-of-Hormuz?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12885/Oman-Rescues-25-Crew-Members-from-Burning-Tanker-in-the-Strait-of-Hormuz?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 17:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — In a significant maritime rescue operation, Omani authorities successfully evacuated 25 crew members from a crude oil tanker that caught fire in the strategic Strait of Hormuz. The incident took place during a period of heightened tensions in the region, where several vessels have reportedly been intercepted or damaged in recent days. The Omani Maritime Security Centre confirmed on Friday that it had safely moved the crew of the merchant vessel RITI to safety. According to maritime tracking data, the ship is a crude oil tanker flying the flag of Panama. The rescue comes as a relief to the international shipping community, as the Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world's most critical transit points for global energy supplies. The cause of the fire on the RITI has not been officially confirmed, though the region has seen a series of maritime incidents lately.This rescue operation occurred simultaneously with reports from regional military forces regarding the movement of oil tankers in the area. Statements issued by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps indicated that four tankers were stopped while attempting to navigate through what they described as "unauthorized routes" within the waterway. According to these reports, some vessels encountered difficulties or were halted due to safety concerns and incidents involving maritime hazards. The situation underscores the complex security environment currently facing commercial shipping in these narrow waters.Further details from regional authorities suggested that at least two tankers carrying significant quantities of oil were involved in explosions and subsequent fires. These reports claimed the incidents were the result of the vessels entering restricted areas. Additionally, naval forces in the area reported the destruction of an unmanned craft near the eastern part of the strait. These developments have led to increased warnings for all commercial vessels to adhere strictly to recognized transit paths to avoid potential dangers.On the other hand, international military representatives have offered a different perspective on the safety of the waterway. Brad Cooper, representing United States Central Command, stated that the internationally recognized primary transit routes in the Strait of Hormuz have been cleared of hazards and remain safe for passage. This statement stands in contrast to claims of widespread danger in the main shipping lanes, suggesting that the risks may be concentrated in specific, non-traditional routes. The conflicting reports highlight the ongoing friction regarding control and navigation rights in the region.The impact of the ongoing instability is clearly visible in global trade statistics. Reports from maritime trade agencies indicate that shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has plummeted by approximately 70 percent compared to levels seen before the recent escalations. This dramatic decrease reflects the caution being exercised by shipping companies and insurers as they navigate the risks of the waterway. The Strait of Hormuz is essential for the transport of a significant portion of the world's oil, and any prolonged disruption continues to have ripples across global energy markets and economic stability. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Apple Reclaims Top Spot as World's Most Valuable Company Amid Market Changes]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12884/Apple-Reclaims-Top-Spot-as-World's-Most-Valuable-Company-Amid-Market-Changes?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12884/Apple-Reclaims-Top-Spot-as-World's-Most-Valuable-Company-Amid-Market-Changes?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 17:05:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Apple has once again secured its position as the world’s most valuable publicly traded company, overtaking Nvidia as the technology sector faces a period of reassessment regarding artificial intelligence investments. This shift reflects a growing preference among investors for companies with strong balance sheets and disciplined spending habits.In a significant market move, Apple saw its market capitalization reach $5.03 trillion, even as its stock experienced a minor daily dip of 1.2%. This performance was enough to push it past Nvidia, which saw its valuation fall to $4.93 trillion following a 4.2% decline in its share price. This change in leadership marks the first time Apple has held the top spot since a brief period earlier this year, signaling a change in investor sentiment across the broader tech landscape.The recent market fluctuations come as investors express increasing skepticism about the massive spending required for artificial intelligence infrastructure. While AI remains a major focus for the future, recent financial updates from several tech giants have raised concerns about when these multi-billion dollar investments will start showing significant returns. Companies like Intel and Amazon recently provided updates that deepened these anxieties, leading to a broader selloff in the technology sector.The retreat from high-flying tech stocks has been notable. For instance, companies like Alphabet and Meta have seen their stock values slide significantly over the past month. Intel, in particular, experienced a sharp single-day drop of nearly 30%. Even Nvidia, which has been at the center of the AI boom, has not been immune to the pressure, seeing a 10% decrease over the last month as the market scrutinizes the long-term demand for high-end semiconductors.Apple’s approach to technology and investment has set it apart during this period of uncertainty. Unlike some of its peers who have committed to unprecedented levels of spending on AI hardware and data centers, Apple has maintained a more measured and cautious investment strategy. This focus on capital discipline has turned Apple into a preferred "safe haven" for institutional investors looking to protect their portfolios while still maintaining exposure to the tech industry. As a result, Apple's stock has risen 27% since the beginning of the year, outperforming many of its closest rivals.A major factor driving this trend is the focus on free cash flow and overall financial health. Recent reports indicate that some major tech players are facing negative free cash flow as they accelerate their infrastructure spending. For example, Alphabet and Amazon have both reported significant deficits in cash generation as they deploy capital at a rapid pace. In contrast, Apple is expected to see its free cash flow expand, providing a level of liquidity and stability that is currently rare in the sector. While other companies are turning to debt markets to fund their AI ambitions, Apple’s organic operational strength continues to offer a sense of security to the market as it waits for AI to prove its commercial value. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Proposal for US-Iran Uranium Transfer and Reopening of Strait of Hormuz]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12883/Proposal-for-US-Iran-Uranium-Transfer-and-Reopening-of-Strait-of-Hormuz?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12883/Proposal-for-US-Iran-Uranium-Transfer-and-Reopening-of-Strait-of-Hormuz?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A new preliminary diplomatic framework has been proposed to ease tensions between the United States and Iran, focusing on the transfer of enriched uranium and the restoration of international maritime access in the Gulf region.The draft negotiations suggest a significant shift in the nuclear standoff, proposing that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium be moved to a designated third country or have its enrichment levels substantially reduced. A key component of this plan involves the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping traffic within seven days of reaching an initial understanding. To ensure the agreement remains stable, China has been suggested as a potential guarantor for its implementation. This framework also moves the venue for direct discussions from Istanbul to Doha, Qatar.The arrangement is designed as a reciprocal process. Under the terms, any steps taken by Iran regarding its nuclear program and maritime security would be met with corresponding measures from the United States to alleviate economic sanctions, blockades, and various financial restrictions. To maintain transparency, an independent verification system would be established to monitor compliance at every stage. This ensures that neither party is forced to make major concessions without seeing verifiable progress from the other side. Furthermore, the draft includes a specialized dispute-resolution system involving mediators to handle any potential delays or breaches of the agreement, aiming to prevent any return to military escalation.Recent diplomatic movements have supported these developments. A Qatari delegation recently visited Tehran to help facilitate a ceasefire and dialogue between the two nations. This team, led by a high-ranking advisor, coordinated closely with officials in Washington. During this visit, a letter from JD Vance was delivered to Mohsen Rezaei. This communication was reportedly viewed positively in Tehran as it offered a new diplomatic avenue to avoid further military confrontations. The outreach suggests a growing preference for dialogue over continued physical conflict.Donald Trump has shared perspectives on the situation, indicating that there is no immediate rush from the American side to conclude the current state of hostilities. He described the situation as a non-typical conflict and suggested that time is on the side of the United States. Donald Trump noted that while there is an ongoing desire for talks, Iran faces significant internal economic challenges, specifically mentioning difficulties in funding various state departments. Despite these pressures, he remains open to the possibility of a substantial and effective agreement being reached in the future.Regional players like Turkey are also actively involved in the diplomatic process. Hakan Fidan and Marco Rubio recently met during a G20 gathering to discuss the progress of these negotiations and broader regional stability. This follows a conversation between Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Donald Trump, where Turkey expressed its support for diplomatic solutions and its interest in maintaining safe maritime passages. The combination of international mediation and direct communication channels marks a critical moment in the effort to find a lasting settlement in the region. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[United States Authorizes Sale of 500 Patriot Missiles to Bolster Ukraine's Air Defenses]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12882/United-States-Authorizes-Sale-of-500-Patriot-Missiles-to-Bolster-Ukraine's-Air-Defenses?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12882/United-States-Authorizes-Sale-of-500-Patriot-Missiles-to-Bolster-Ukraine's-Air-Defenses?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — The United States government has greenlit a significant military sale involving 500 Patriot missiles intended to enhance Ukraine's ability to protect its territory from aerial threats. This $2.1 billion deal aims to provide critical defense munitions as the region faces ongoing challenges to its energy and civilian infrastructure. The U.S. State Department confirmed the approval of the advanced PAC-3 interceptor missiles, a move seen as vital for maintaining regional stability. While the approval is a major step, Volodymyr Zelensky has noted that the actual delivery of these sophisticated systems could span several years. The funding for this multi-billion dollar acquisition will not come from American taxpayers; instead, it is being fully covered by international partners including Canada, Germany, and Norway, utilizing national funds and the European Union’s support mechanisms. The urgency of these defenses is highlighted by recent events on the ground. Recent reports indicate that nearly 200,000 households in the Dnipro area and 80,000 in the Kyiv region were left without electricity following strikes on energy facilities. Volodymyr Zelensky has emphasized that these actions target the daily lives of civilians, making the arrival of interceptor missiles a matter of national survival. Despite the approval, there is a clear call for more immediate action, as the transition into the winter months traditionally puts more strain on the power grid. The diplomatic backdrop of this sale is equally complex. The decision follows a period of tension involving Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky regarding sanctions and energy deals. While some friction existed over the direction of the conflict and leadership preferences, recent discussions in Oslo appear to have smoothed the path for this military cooperation. The State Department noted that this sale aligns with foreign policy goals by supporting a partner that contributes to the economic and political stability of Europe. Logistically, the production of these missiles faces hurdles. The American aerospace firm Lockheed Martin is the primary contractor for the order. However, there is a global shortage of such munitions, and the current order consists of new builds rather than existing inventory. With a global production capacity of approximately 600 missiles per year, the timeline for delivery remains a point of concern for those on the front lines. Earlier this month, Donald Trump commented on the licensing of such technology, adding another layer of complexity to the manufacturing and supply chain discussions. Meanwhile, international pressure continues to mount at the G20 meeting in Atlanta. During the summit, hosted by Marco Rubio, European diplomats expressed their stance on the regional conflict. Ed Miliband specifically addressed Sergei Lavrov, pointing to the human cost of the ongoing hostilities. This diplomatic atmosphere underscores the global significance of the Patriot sale as part of a broader effort to manage the security landscape in Eastern Europe while addressing the immediate humanitarian needs of the population. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New York City Proposes POWER Act to Expand Legal Action Against Businesses]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12881/New-York-City-Proposes-POWER-Act-to-Expand-Legal-Action-Against-Businesses?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12881/New-York-City-Proposes-POWER-Act-to-Expand-Legal-Action-Against-Businesses?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — New York City is moving toward a significant shift in its legal landscape with the introduction of the People and Organizations Winning Economic Relief (POWER) Act. This proposed legislation aims to provide individuals and organizations with a broad private right of action to sue businesses for practices deemed unfair, deceptive, or abusive, even without proving direct financial harm. The POWER Act, introduced by Zohran Mamdani, seeks to establish a municipal framework that mirrors federal consumer protection standards but applies them more broadly across the city. If passed, the law would allow residents to file lawsuits against entities for a wide range of business behaviors. The legislation incorporates the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s framework regarding "abusive acts," mandating that these provisions be interpreted as widely as possible to protect the public interest. One of the most significant aspects of the POWER Act is its scope. It does not limit itself to traditional consumer transactions. Instead, it covers any acts or practices that affect business, trade, or commerce. This definition is broad enough to potentially include disputes involving real estate, such as cooperatives and condominiums, landlord-tenant relationships, and even the management of trusts and estates. Because the terms "trade" and "commerce" are not strictly defined within the bill, legal experts suggest it could lead to a surge in litigation across various sectors that were previously governed by narrower state or federal laws. A unique and controversial feature of this legislation is that it would permit legal claims without requiring the plaintiff to prove they relied on a deceptive practice or suffered an actual, quantifiable injury. Under current standards, a person usually has to show they were harmed to win a lawsuit. However, the POWER Act would allow for statutory damages of up to $2,500 per violation based simply on the occurrence of the act itself. Furthermore, the bill empowers nonprofit organizations and advocacy groups to file lawsuits on behalf of New York City residents, which could lead to more class-action style litigation. Critics of the bill argue that it could create a challenging environment for the local economy. By introducing regulatory uncertainty, businesses may face higher insurance costs or become hesitant to operate within the five boroughs. The broad language of the act means that standard business practices could be reclassified as "abusive" or "unfair" depending on judicial interpretation. This shift essentially places a higher burden on businesses to prove their innocence in court, as the law focuses on the potential for injury rather than the intent of the business or the actual outcome for the consumer. Despite the sweeping nature of the proposal, there are specific exemptions included. The POWER Act specifies that it does not create a private right of action against the city government itself or its employees. Additionally, it protects very small businesses, defined as those that are independently owned, have four or fewer employees, and earn less than five million dollars in annual gross revenue. This suggests an attempt to shield the smallest entrepreneurs while holding larger corporations to a more rigorous standard of conduct. As the City Council considers this legislation, questions remain regarding its authority to enact laws that may overlap or conflict with existing New York State General Business Laws. If enacted, the POWER Act would represent one of the most aggressive municipal-level consumer and economic protection laws in the United States, fundamentally changing how legal disputes are handled in the city. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[From a Mamdani Promise to 10,500 Licenses for NYC Street Vendors]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12880/From-a-Mamdani-Promise-to-10%2C500-Licenses-for-NYC-Street-Vendors?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12880/From-a-Mamdani-Promise-to-10%2C500-Licenses-for-NYC-Street-Vendors?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 22:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA["There is nothing harder than poverty except the fear of losing your livelihood: going out every morning to earn a living, not knowing whether you will bring it home or come back weighed down by loss." On the sidewalks of New York City, thousands of men and women start each morning the same hard journey. They carry their goods and their hopes into a day that could end with a sale, a fine, or a seized cart. For many of them, a small cart or a folding table is not just a business. It is the family's only income, the rent, the groceries, the school costs, and perhaps the last hope for a more stable life. Behind that simple picture are years of waiting, red tape, tickets, and the constant fear of losing everything. From a meeting with Mamdani to a promise awaiting action On February 23, 2025, I met Zohran Mamdani in person. At the time he was a state assemblyman running for mayor. I spoke with him about the hardships of NYC street vendors, the long years of waiting for licenses, and the thousands of families who depend on this work to put food on the table. During our meeting, he promised me he would support street vendors and work to help them. After the meeting, one question stayed with me: would Zohran Mamdani keep his promise if he reached a position of power? Today, with the announcement of 10,500 additional licenses for general vendors, I see a concrete step worth pausing on. It reopens a file that has been a source of worry and hardship for thousands of vendors for many years. The new general vendor licenses come from Local Law 54 of 2026, passed by the New York City Council as part of a street vendor reform package. The city's Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) is carrying it out under Mayor Mamdani. I do not claim this step came from my meeting alone, or that the road is now free of obstacles. But we have every right to recall promises when we see real steps in the direction we have waited for so long. 10,500 new chances: who benefits? The 10,500 additional licenses are for general vendors, people who sell non-food goods such as clothing, shoes, bags, accessories, toys, and gifts. They are divided into two types: 2,625 Citywide licenses, which allow vending in all five boroughs under the city's rules. 7,875 Non-Manhattan licenses, for vending outside Manhattan. One point needs to be clear: these licenses are for non-food merchandise. They are not 10,500 new permits for food or drink carts. Each category has its own system and rules. Under the announced schedule, the waitlist opens on November 2, 2026, and closes at 5:00 p.m. on December 16, 2026. The city will begin issuing licenses on January 15, 2027. Applications can be made online or by mail. People on the old 2016 waitlist received their offers first; on the new lists, former street vendors who can prove past vending may get higher priority numbers. Official details are posted at nyc.gov/BusinessToolbox. But joining the waitlist does not mean getting a license right away, and it does not exempt anyone from the law or from tickets. Read the official requirements carefully before applying. A story that began in 2012, and was never just news Alhawadeth has followed the street vendor issue in New York with our readers since 2012. We did not just report the news or write stories. We were at the events and the protests, we followed the meetings and New York City Council hearings, and we testified before officials more than once. We joined rallies and protests, stood among the vendors, listened to their stories, carried their struggles to the public, and documented what happens on the sidewalks. Together with you, we documented thousands of photos and hundreds of videos. We followed the long wait, from endless lists to repeated demands that people be allowed to work legally and safely. For us, this was never only about numbers or licenses. It was about fathers and mothers, families trying to live with dignity, and people asking for nothing more than a fair chance to work. And you were our witnesses. We followed this story with you, reported it to you, and documented it year after year, because we believed that the voice of the ordinary vendor deserves to reach officials, and that the sidewalk is not just a place to sell. Thousands of people make their living there. Free help for applicants As part of our coverage, I spoke with Calvin Harrison of the Street Vendor Project, a vendor advocacy group. He told me the organization will help, free of charge, anyone who needs support with the license application. That matters, especially for vendors who may not know where to start or who find the official procedures and requirements hard to follow. A real opportunity should not stop at knowing the registration date. There must be real help to make sure people understand their rights, know the steps to apply, and avoid middlemen or paying money they do not need to pay. Is the chase over? The announcement of 10,500 licenses is an important step, but it is not the end of the story. Real success will not be measured only by the number of licenses announced. It will be measured by how many people actually receive them, how clear the process is, how quickly applications are handled, and whether vendors can work without constant fear of seizure, fines, or losing their livelihood. Food and beverage vendors also still need their own solution, and their problems should not be confused with the licensing of non-food merchandise. The most important question remains: will this step become a real beginning for organizing street work, or will it stay a big number in an official announcement while the daily struggle on the sidewalks goes on? A final word Behind every cart there is a story, and behind every small table there is a family waiting for its owner to come home at the end of the day with enough to cover the household's needs. If all this effort has helped, even in a small way, to change the life of just one person, to let a father feed his children, help a mother secure her family's future, or give a vendor the chance to work with dignity and safety, that is enough for me. I remember my meeting with Zohran Mamdani and his promise to support street vendors. I remember long years of coverage, testimony, and action. Today, we do not want to stop at celebrating the announcement. We want to see its real impact on the ground, and we will keep following until those who deserve it get their chance. Now I ask you: do you think 10,500 licenses can truly change the lives of thousands of families, or does the fight of New York's street vendors still need bigger steps? By Ahmad Mourad, journalist based in New York Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Palestinian Zajal and the Clifton City Council Race]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12879/Palestinian-Zajal-and-the-Clifton-City-Council-Race?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12879/Palestinian-Zajal-and-the-Clifton-City-Council-Race?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 21:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[CLIFTON, N.J. | Oct. 27, 2026 In a scene that blends politics with Palestinian culture, Tarek Alnatur, a candidate for the Clifton City Council in New Jersey, appears alongside Palestinian zajal poet Mohammad Barghouti in video clips that raise a question bigger than a local race: How do the cultural and social ties that bind Arab communities in the United States become spaces for taking part in public life? At first glance, the meeting may look like part of the usual atmosphere of an election campaign. But the presence of Palestinian zajal, a form of improvised folk poetry, beside a candidate for an American city council invites a wider reading of the relationship between cultural memory and belonging to a new homeland, and between holding on to one's roots and taking part in local institutions. Palestinian zajal: a memory that speaks in the people's voice Zajal and improvised folk poetry hold a special place in Palestinian culture. It is not merely an art for entertainment or celebrations, but a way of expressing joy, grief, longing and belonging, and a space for direct contact between the poet and the audience. Oral folk poetry has helped preserve elements of Palestinian cultural identity through generations of historical upheaval, uprooting and exile. In Palestinian communities abroad, these arts take on an added dimension. They help keep the language, the dialect and memory present in daily life, and they create a space where different generations meet. But heritage does not live outside social reality; cultural gatherings can also become occasions to discuss schools, taxes, services and political representation, the issues that concern citizens where they live. From cultural identity to civic participation Alnatur's appearance alongside Barghouti raises a question about the relationship between cultural belonging and American citizenship. Belonging to a Palestinian heritage does not conflict with taking part in running a multicultural American city. And political participation, in turn, does not mean giving up memory, language or roots. Tarek Alnatur in the Clifton election Tarek Alnatur is running for the Clifton City Council in the election scheduled for Nov. 3, 2026, in a nonpartisan local race in which 19 candidates are competing for seven seats. According to materials published on his campaign website, Alnatur lists fiscal responsibility, public safety and strengthening community ties among his stated priorities. The race matters locally because the council makes decisions that touch residents' daily lives, including city services, public spending and local policy. From this standpoint, the presence of citizens of Arab origin in local races deserves news coverage as part of civic participation, alongside coverage of the other candidates, their platforms, and holding them accountable for their promises. Palestinian roots, American citizenship In the lives of immigrants and their children, identity is not a single choice between past and present. A citizen may carry a cultural memory tied to Palestine while also caring about the future of the American city where he lives, works and raises his children. Here culture can play an important social role: it brings people together, keeps them connected, and lets them get to know one another and exchange views. But turning these ties into real political participation depends on many factors, including civic organization, trust in institutions and interest in public affairs. That is why the scene that brings zajal and politics together in Clifton invites us to see Arab Americans not only as a cultural audience, nor as a single voting bloc, but as citizens with diverse views and interests who exercise their rights in a multi-background American society. After the election The race will end on Nov. 3 with the announcement of the results, but the questions raised by this meeting will remain. How will Arab Americans' political participation on city councils develop? Will social and cultural ties turn into lasting civic institutions? And how can community members keep their own identity while also taking part in local decision-making? These questions deserve follow-up, whatever the results for any candidate. Between the voice of the Palestinian zajal poet and the seats of the Clifton City Council, a space opens for dialogue about the meaning of belonging and citizenship: to carry one's memory along, and to take part in shaping the present of the place where one lives. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[They Killed My Childhood Friend, Mohammad Al-Qsous]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12878/They-Killed-My-Childhood-Friend%2C-Mohammad-Al-Qsous?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12878/They-Killed-My-Childhood-Friend%2C-Mohammad-Al-Qsous?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[When darkness assassinates a childhood friend, and fear takes root in an age of takfir By Adnan Khalil I am angry to the depths of my soul. I am not angry only because terrorist bullets killed my former classmate and boyhood friend, Dr. Mohammad Al-Qsous. I am angry because his killers, and those who spread their ideology, are stealing my religious identity. They are hijacking the Islam of my father, my mother and my grandfather. It was an Islam of solidarity and good neighbors, of shared bread and salt, of people who open their homes and hearts to others. They want to erase from my memory the neighborhood where I grew up. I remember the sweet voice of the muezzin at Omar Mosque, and the warm voice of Father Ghassan, the parish priest, visiting our neighbor Abu Elias. Those sounds shaped us. It never crossed our minds that a difference in religion could one day become a reason for hatred or murder. You scoundrels, who gave you the right to hijack religion? Who gave you the right to kill Mohammad in the name of God? The news of his death, and the deaths of those with him, felt like a hand reaching into my memory. It stabbed it, tore out a living piece, and trampled it under a bloodstained boot. I knew Mohammad in Zarqa, the industrial city northeast of Jordan's capital, Amman. It was a city of workers, refugees, small traders and soldiers, a big city with small dreams. Back then, the future looked like an open door to a better world. Later I learned that the boy who shared our school benches had become a dentist. People called him "the doctor of the poor," because he made his profession a way to serve those in need. He was a Christian man named Mohammad, the name of the Prophet of Islam. Perhaps his parents' choice reflected the everyday closeness of our communities, where names were bridges, not walls. Was Mohammad an enemy because he was a Christian? Or did he believe in human dignity more than all your slogans? Mohammad Al-Qsous and several others were killed in the terrorist attack on St. George's Greek Orthodox Church. The church is in the village of Hammoud, in Jordan's southern Karak governorate. The attack came on Friday, October 23, 2026, while they were attending a funeral. Jordanians laid them to rest on Monday, October 26. Hammoud is not a village on Mars Hammoud, Smakiyeh and Karak are not just names on a map. They are part of a deep social and national history of brotherhood and diversity, and of struggle for freedom and dignity. People from Karak and other southern towns took part in the April 1989 uprising, known in Jordan as Habbet Nisan. It opened a new chapter in the fight for political freedoms and the return of parliamentary life. That is why the Karak church attack was not only an assault on a church. It was an assault on a history, and on values built over generations. The killers may not know that history. But not everyone who feeds their ideology or invests in hatred is ignorant of what it means. Damn an ideology that sees nothing in a person but his religion, sees nothing in religion but a tool for power, and knows nothing of God but a name to hang on the barrel of a gun. The generation of the Nakba and the Naksa: how did we end up here? We are children of the 1950s. We opened our eyes on the wound of Palestine and the Nakba, the 1948 displacement of the Palestinians. Then we lived through the Arab defeat of June 1967, known as the Naksa. We knew tents, refugee camps, poverty and oppression. Yet we were not a hopeless generation. We believed colonialism would end. We believed that education, work and struggle would open the doors to dignity and justice. We dreamed of a homeland where no citizen is asked about his religion or sect before his right to a free and dignified life is recognized. Our dreams were bigger than our defeats. So how did we move from the dream of liberation to the nightmares of takfiri extremists in our own cities? Takfiris brand other Muslims and people of other faiths as unbelievers in order to justify killing them. And all this while occupation and war pull the ground from under our feet. I cannot separate this ruin from a long history of imperial interventions and the use of religion against national, leftist and progressive movements. Nor can I separate it from authoritarian regimes, networks of money and incitement, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which created fertile ground for extremist groups. This does not mean these groups are puppets moved by a single hand. Nor does it mean our societies bear no responsibility for producing extremism. But it is our peoples who have paid the price: torn countries, millions of refugees, and a great religion that ignorant fanatics try to reduce to scenes of beheadings and bombings. My anger crosses the ocean I live here in America, and my anger is doubled. Every crime committed by an extremist in the name of Islam hands racists new material to smear millions of Muslims, who are themselves victims of this ideology. President Donald Trump has repeatedly called Abdul El-Sayed, the Muslim Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, "Mohammed." In Arab naming tradition, a person's full name lists his own first name, then his father's name, then his grandfather's, then the family name. So "Mohamed," which appears second in El-Sayed's full name, is not a name he goes by; it is usually his father's name. Trump kept using it after being corrected, while calling him a jihadist and an extremist. This is not a slip of the tongue. It is a political message of contempt for the identity of a Muslim American citizen, meant to tie that identity to terrorism. In a climate where restrictions on immigrants from Muslim-majority countries are on the table, I feel I am being asked to apologize for who I am. Damn the takfiri who kills in God's name, the politician who profits from his crime, and the criminals who justify killing, displacing or exterminating civilians, whatever their religious, nationalist or security excuse. The person killed in a church, the child buried under the rubble of his home, the civilian driven from his land: all are victims of greed and savagery. I do not need a fatwa to love Mohammad Al-Qsous, or a sheikh's permission to mourn him. Nations are not built on some imagined religious purity. They are built on justice and freedom that protect everyone, and on a culture that sees diversity as wealth, not a threat. The killers will not have the last word I admit I am tired of news of death, and of a world where killers seem to move more freely than dreamers. But I will not let my exhaustion turn into surrender. If they want to turn our differences into mutual fear, we must not hand them victory by fearing one another. I want my anger to stay alive, not to call for revenge, but to refuse silence. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Russia and Ukraine Start Local Ceasefire in Oleshky While Strikes Persist Elsewhere]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12877/Russia-and-Ukraine-Start-Local-Ceasefire-in-Oleshky-While-Strikes-Persist-Elsewhere?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12877/Russia-and-Ukraine-Start-Local-Ceasefire-in-Oleshky-While-Strikes-Persist-Elsewhere?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A regional ceasefire has been initiated in the town of Oleshky to facilitate humanitarian aid, even as military operations continue in other parts of the region, including the capital city of Kyiv. This localized pause in fighting is intended to address the desperate need for food and medical supplies in the frontline area while diplomatic efforts for a broader peace agreement continue behind the scenes.The ceasefire in Oleshky, located on the eastern bank of the Dnipro River, began early Tuesday morning. Officials from both sides confirmed that the temporary halt in shelling was designed to allow for the delivery of essential goods and the potential evacuation of civilians. Oleshky has been facing severe shortages of basic necessities since the early stages of the conflict in February 2022. The town sits directly across the river from the city of Kherson, making it a critical point for humanitarian logistics. Dmytro Lubinets, a representative involved in the negotiations, confirmed that the commitment to the halt was being honored to ensure the safety of the humanitarian corridor.The agreement for this specific pause was reportedly reached through coordination involving Melania Trump and Yana Lantratova. This diplomatic intervention highlights the ongoing international interest in establishing humanitarian windows amidst the ongoing hostilities. While the situation in Oleshky offered a brief moment of calm, the broader conflict showed no signs of slowing down. Reports indicated that the Russian defense ministry stopped shelling toward Kherson to prepare for the Oleshky effort, but actions intensified in other strategic locations.In Kyiv, new strikes targeted vital infrastructure, including the Southern Bridge and the city's subway system. These attacks forced a total suspension of traffic and caused significant disruptions for residents. Witnesses reported hearing multiple explosions throughout the morning. In addition to the capital, other cities such as Kharkiv and Pavlohrad also faced missile attacks. Since Monday evening, a strike on Kyiv resulted in at least one death and left 15 people injured, including students residing in a dormitory. These incidents underscore the continued danger faced by civilians despite localized efforts to pause the fighting.The logistics of the conflict also extended into neighboring regions. A drone attack was reported in the city of Bryansk, near the border, resulting in one fatality. Similarly, in the Zaporizhzhia region, a drone struck a bus, leading to one death and dozens of injuries. Both sides continue to maintain that they do not intentionally target civilian populations, although the toll on non-combatants remains high. The destruction of transport hubs and industrial facilities remains a focal point of the military strategies employed.Looking ahead, there is a focus on high-level diplomacy. Volodymyr Zelenskiy noted that technical-level talks between representatives from the United States, Russia, and Ukraine are scheduled for the first half of November in Abu Dhabi. These discussions aim to build on the current mediations and find a path toward ending the deadliest conflict Europe has seen in decades. As the world watches these developments, the Oleshky ceasefire serves as a fragile example of how humanitarian needs can sometimes lead to temporary localized agreements in the midst of a larger struggle. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Elections in Israel and the United States: Global Consequences and Regional Shifts]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12876/Elections-in-Israel-and-the-United-States%3A-Global-Consequences-and-Regional-Shifts?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12876/Elections-in-Israel-and-the-United-States%3A-Global-Consequences-and-Regional-Shifts?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Two major elections taking place on different continents this week are set to reshape the international political landscape. As voters in Israel and the United States head to the polls, the outcomes could dictate the future of regional conflicts, global energy markets, and diplomatic alliances.While separated by thousands of miles, the upcoming votes in Israel and the United States are deeply connected by shared geopolitical interests and a significant population of dual citizens. Approximately half a million people living in Israel hold American passports, making them a crucial demographic that could influence tight races in the U.S. midterm elections. These voters represent a direct physical link between the two nations, highlighting how localized political decisions can have far-reaching international effects.At the heart of both campaigns is the ongoing tension involving Iran. In Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu has focused his platform on national security, frequently suggesting the necessity of further military actions against the Iranian government. These statements are seen by many as an attempt to consolidate support following previous security challenges. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has signaled strong support for such measures, although reports suggest he may prefer to avoid major escalations before the U.S. polls to prevent a surge in global energy prices that could negatively impact voters.The economic stakes are equally high. The global cost of living has been a primary concern for voters in both countries. In the United States, the focus remains on inflation and energy costs, which have been exacerbated by regional instability and the disruption of energy routes in the Middle East. Similarly, the Israeli public is grappling with high living costs and low wages, further pressured by significant increases in defense spending. The way these new governments manage their economies will determine not only domestic stability but also the health of the global market.Internal political dynamics are also shifting. In Israel, figures like Gadi Eisenkot have voiced concerns about the potential for military decisions to be influenced by political survival. There is a debate over whether a new administration would continue current military strategies or seek a different path for regional stability. In the United States, some candidates have begun to question the traditional bipartisan consensus on military aid, suggesting that future support may come with more conditions depending on which party gains control of the legislature.Ultimately, the decisions made by voters in the coming days will have a profound impact on the Middle East and beyond. If the elections lead to a change in leadership or a shift in legislative power, the strategies regarding Iran, Gaza, and international trade could see significant revisions. Diplomats and policymakers worldwide are closely watching these developments, as the results will likely define the geopolitical climate for years to come. The world is waiting to see how these two democratic exercises will alter the course of history. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Diplomatic Efforts in Tehran Face Challenges as Regional Tensions Rise]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12875/Diplomatic-Efforts-in-Tehran-Face-Challenges-as-Regional-Tensions-Rise?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12875/Diplomatic-Efforts-in-Tehran-Face-Challenges-as-Regional-Tensions-Rise?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A high-level delegation recently visited Tehran to explore a potential ceasefire and regional de-escalation, but the mission concluded with only an agreement to maintain open lines of communication. This diplomatic push occurs alongside reports of heightened military readiness in the region, with various international forces preparing for potential shifts in the security landscape following early November.The diplomatic mission included Khalid bin Salman, Asim Munir, and Ibrahim Kalin, representing a coalition formed through a mutual-defense agreement signed earlier this year. During the visit, the group met with officials such as Mohsen Rezaei and Masoud Pezeshkian. While the discussions were described as an attempt to strengthen cooperation among regional neighbors, the official joint statement lacked specifics regarding a formal truce or a halt to ongoing hostilities. This has left observers questioning the immediate impact of such high-level talks on the current security crisis.A major factor complicating these negotiations is the role of international players. Reports suggest that military forces in the Middle East are maintaining a high state of alert, capable of executing significant operations within a 96-hour window if ordered. Specifically, plans involving the United States and Israel have been discussed regarding potential actions following upcoming political milestones in November. The situation is further strained by the fact that many of the demands for regional stability—such as the lifting of sanctions or the release of frozen assets—require decisions from Washington rather than Riyadh or its allies.On the ground, the conflict continues to take a toll. Defensive systems have been active in intercepting drones and missiles targeting various locations, including major urban centers and energy infrastructure. However, there are concerns regarding the sustainability of these defensive measures, as stockpiles of interceptor missiles are reportedly decreasing. This military pressure is mirrored by economic challenges. The disruption of shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz has significantly reduced oil export volumes, leading to a notable fiscal deficit and a general slowdown in regional investment. Some international airlines have even suspended flights to the area due to security concerns.The strategic concept of "endogenous security" has been raised by officials in Tehran, suggesting that regional safety should be managed by local states without the presence of outside powers. This position creates a fundamental disagreement with the current defense architecture of many Gulf states, which relies heavily on international partnerships for advanced air defense systems. As the diplomatic window appears to narrow, the focus shifts toward how regional powers will manage the potential for further escalation and whether a sustainable path to peace can be found through existing mediation channels in Qatar and Pakistan. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Major $35.7 Million Central Park Project Launched to Prevent Flooding and Conserve Water in Harlem]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12874/Major-%2435.7-Million-Central-Park-Project-Launched-to-Prevent-Flooding-and-Conserve-Water-in-Harlem?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12874/Major-%2435.7-Million-Central-Park-Project-Launched-to-Prevent-Flooding-and-Conserve-Water-in-Harlem?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:53:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A significant environmental initiative has officially begun in northern Manhattan, aiming to tackle the dual challenges of urban flooding and water waste. The North End Recirculation Project, a $35.7 million investment, was recently inaugurated by Zohran Kwame Mamdani, Kathy Hochul, and Betsy Smith. This project is designed to protect the Harlem and East Harlem neighborhoods while modernizing the way one of the world's most famous parks manages its water resources. By the time it is completed in late 2028, the system is expected to save millions of gallons of drinking water every year and provide a critical buffer against the increasing threat of heavy storms. The core of the project involves a sophisticated recirculation system that will connect three major water bodies in the northern part of Central Park: the Pool, the Loch, and the Harlem Meer. Currently, these areas rely heavily on the city’s drinking water supply to maintain their levels. The new system will allow water to be filtered and reused within the park, drastically reducing the need for treated tap water. Experts estimate that this change will conserve approximately 175 million gallons of potable water annually, a vital step in ensuring the long-term sustainability of the city's resources.Beyond conservation, the project serves as a crucial piece of infrastructure for flood mitigation. During periods of heavy rainfall, the city's combined sewer system often becomes overwhelmed, leading to flooding in low-lying areas like Harlem and East Harlem. The North End Recirculation Project will give officials the ability to lower water levels in the Harlem Meer in anticipation of major storms. This creates a natural basin to capture incoming rainwater, preventing it from overflowing into local streets and sewers. It is estimated that 132 million gallons of stormwater will be diverted from the sewer system each year, significantly easing the pressure on neighborhood infrastructure.Funding for this ambitious endeavor comes from a diverse group of supporters. More than $19.6 million was provided through city capital funding, with a substantial portion coming from the Department of Environmental Protection. Additionally, a $10 million Green Resiliency Grant was secured through state environmental funds. Private contributions and support from local representatives, including Julie Menin, Brad Hoylman-Sigal, and Gale Brewer, have also played a key role in making the project a reality. This partnership highlights a shared commitment to building a more resilient city in the face of a changing climate.The project also pays homage to the original vision of the park’s designers, Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux. The water bodies in the northern end were originally built as an interconnected system in the mid-1860s. By restoring and modernizing this watercourse, the current initiative ensures that these historic landscapes can continue to serve the public while meeting modern environmental standards. As construction moves forward, the focus remains on enhancing water quality and reducing harmful algal blooms, making the park a healthier environment for both residents and local wildlife for generations to come. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Judge Extends Halt on Donald Trump's Washington Golf Course Renovation Project]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12873/Judge-Extends-Halt-on-Donald-Trump's-Washington-Golf-Course-Renovation-Project?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12873/Judge-Extends-Halt-on-Donald-Trump's-Washington-Golf-Course-Renovation-Project?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A federal judge has extended a legal order that prevents Donald Trump from moving forward with renovation plans for a historic public golf course in Washington, D.C. This decision ensures the site remains protected while a lawsuit regarding the project’s impact continues.In a recent ruling, Judge Ana Reyes issued a preliminary injunction that temporarily stops any further removal or damage to trees at the East Potomac Golf Course. The century-old site has become a point of legal contention, and the new order requires the administration to provide at least 10 days of written notice before making any permanent changes to the course’s layout or features. This move comes as the court seeks to maintain the status quo while examining the legal challenges brought forward by preservationists and local golfers.The legal dispute intensified after workers reportedly removed hundreds of trees over a weekend with very little warning. Judge Reyes, in her written opinion, emphasized the importance of the rule of law over personal preferences. She famously referenced the literary character the Lorax, stating that while she does not personally "speak for the trees," she must uphold the legal requirements that govern such public projects. The judge expressed concern over conflicting information, noting that statements made by Donald Trump regarding the immediate start of construction seemed to contradict the testimony provided by government officials in court.Donald Trump has expressed strong disagreement with the court’s intervention. Upon returning from a trip to Mississippi, he indicated that the project would eventually proceed and criticized the judge's oversight of the architectural plans. He described the renovation as a "beautiful project" aimed at modernizing the facility for safety and aesthetic reasons. Despite the legal pause, Donald Trump reiterated plans on social media to close the facility for a 15-month period to complete the overhaul, which he views as a necessary improvement for the nation’s capital.The lawsuit was initiated by the DC Preservation League along with two local golfers who argue that the planned renovations would cause "irreparable harm" to a historic landscape. The East Potomac Golf Course, which is over a hundred years old, is considered a significant part of Washington’s park system. The plaintiffs are concerned that the aggressive construction schedule would destroy the historical character of the grounds. This specific project is part of a broader initiative by Donald Trump to leave a lasting mark on Washington’s landmarks, which also includes proposals for a new ballroom at the White House and a national monument park.The government’s legal team previously asked Judge Reyes to step down from the case, questioning her fairness after a heated emergency hearing. However, the judge denied this request and moved forward with the injunction. She compared the current legal state to a game of golf, noting that the court is simply "marking the ball" to allow for a fair trial rather than ending the project entirely. Supporters of the preservation effort have hailed the ruling as a significant victory for protecting public spaces from hasty development. As the case moves forward, the court will continue to evaluate whether the administration has the authority to bypass certain environmental and historical preservation standards for the sake of the renovation. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Trump and the Plan to Rescue Israel]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12872/Trump-and-the-Plan-to-Rescue-Israel?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12872/Trump-and-the-Plan-to-Rescue-Israel?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 01:14:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[Amid the uncertainty surrounding relations with Israel, the United States' strategic ally in the Middle East and the pillar of its policy in the region, President Trump has put forward before the elections, with his usual decisiveness, a new, almost miraculous plan to solve all of Israel's problems at once. Since it has become clear that neither the ruling coalition nor the opposition coalition will win enough votes to form a government on its own in the Israeli elections scheduled for the 27th of this month, the White House chief has proposed breaking through these barriers and forming a broad "national unity" government. According to some Israeli media reports, citing reliable sources inside the U.S. administration, Prime Minister and Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu and opposition leader and Yashar party leader General Gadi Eisenkot were informed of this plan through secret channels. Eisenkot appears to have already agreed to it, but Netanyahu is still negotiating some of the details, even though he has no other option. The basic idea of the plan is to allow Netanyahu to remain in office for only two years after the elections, but with very limited powers and without his former allies from the far-right parties. After that, he would leave the political arena for good and be replaced by Gadi Eisenkot, Trump's ally and "close friend." Modern Israeli history has seen similar scenarios of one term being divided between two politicians. To keep Netanyahu's powers from being restricted too sharply, President Isaac Herzog, who has limited powers but holds the power to grant pardons, has been brought into the plan, and the Americans are pressing him, though with unclear results, to drop the criminal prosecution of Netanyahu on earlier charges if he agrees to the proposed deal. The U.S. ambassador to Israel is one of the key figures pushing this agreement, and he has established regular channels of communication with opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot. Although American officials claim they are not interfering in the Israeli elections, they have made clear that they "welcome the formation of a broad and stable government, free of extremist elements." Trump publicly denies any interference in the will of the Israeli people, claiming that he "doesn't trust anyone there, and doesn't trust anyone in the world!" Before every election, he consistently expressed his confidence in Netanyahu at least, and categorically called on people to vote for him alone. Now Trump has abandoned this position completely, and the White House appears to have removed Netanyahu entirely from the political scene, regarding him as an "expired" figure, which is unusual for him. The U.S. president said in an interview with Newsmax on October 16: "If I were a candidate for prime minister of Israel, I would get 99% of the vote." So it seems the Israeli people are expressing their opinion, as if he were asking them about it. But Trump said of Eisenkot that he "hasn't heard anything bad about him," which can also be seen as a kind of support. Eisenkot is expected to set a number of conditions in the Knesset for joining a broad coalition. He is likely to demand that Netanyahu strictly commit to the resignation timetable, repeal the laws passed during the judicial overhaul, purge his bloc of the most disliked figures and parties, and abandon his alliances with parties such as Itamar Ben-Gvir's Jewish Power and Bezalel Smotrich's Religious Zionism. He is also likely to raise questions about the participation of the Orthodox parties in the broader coalition, such as the Sephardi Shas party and the Ashkenazi United Torah Judaism. Without these last parties, there may not be enough votes for a majority. Despite all of the above, it seems that something is being plotted for the region, with or without Netanyahu, as the likelihood grows that the region will face new challenges and as the Yemeni factor emerges. This is especially so given the position of the new "peacemakers" who would replace Netanyahu and who differ little from the current government on the main issues. One of them is former Israeli army chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, who lost his son in the fighting in Gaza, and who, like Netanyahu, categorically rejects the idea of an independent Palestinian state as set out in UN Security Council resolutions; nor does he show any enthusiasm for Trump's "Riviera" project in Gaza. Eisenkot has already promised to remove Hamas completely from power in the Strip within 18 months of taking office, something impossible to achieve except by force and military brutality. But despite all the killing and crimes against the Palestinian people, and without a just solution to the Palestinian cause, and despite all the statements and efforts by Arab regimes and officials in the Israeli entity about the need for peaceful relations and for advancing the Abraham Accords, these have no hope of success. This is what experience and attempts at imposition have confirmed from the 1948 partition of Palestine until today. They will not be granted life or continuity, and neither will succeed in bringing the Palestinian people to their knees, whether in politics or on the battlefield. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Al-Ghazali's Influence on Western Thought]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12871/Al-Ghazali's-Influence-on-Western-Thought?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12871/Al-Ghazali's-Influence-on-Western-Thought?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[It is impossible to talk about the influence of Imam al-Ghazali (450-505 AH / 1058-1111 CE) on Western thought without facing two basic questions. The first: How could a Muslim philosopher who lived in the eleventh and early twelfth centuries enter, directly or indirectly, the history of European ideas, which took shape over long centuries in a religious, linguistic and political environment different from the one in which he lived? The second: Was al-Ghazali's influence in the West a fixed one that can be traced from text to text, or do some of the similarities we find between his ideas and those of Western philosophers go back to shared human questions that occupied the mind in many civilizations? Al-Ghazali is a figure who is hard to confine to a single field. He was a jurist, a scholar of legal theory, a theologian, and a student of philosophy and Sufism. At the same time, he was a man preoccupied with the problem of knowledge, the limits of reason, the nature of certainty, the relationship between man and religion, and a person's ability to distinguish between what he believes because he inherited it and what he is assured of after examination and reflection. One of the most common mistakes in approaching al-Ghazali is reducing him to the image of a man who fought philosophy and closed the door of rational thinking to Muslims. This image is usually tied to his book The Incoherence of the Philosophers, but it does not hold up against a reading of his works as a whole. Al-Ghazali studied logic and philosophy closely enough to present the philosophers' positions and arguments, then debated and criticized them, distinguishing between the issues he found acceptable and those he believed contained errors or went beyond what reason can prove. His position was not the same toward all the sciences the philosophers addressed. In his book The Aims of the Philosophers, he presented an important part of their views on logic, physics and metaphysics; then came The Incoherence of the Philosophers to discuss specific questions, among them the eternity of the world, God's knowledge of particulars, and bodily resurrection. He held that some of the philosophers' claims on these subjects did not rest on decisive proofs, and that presenting them as necessary rational truths went beyond what their evidence allowed. The importance of this position lies in the fact that al-Ghazali did not treat a philosopher's stature as proof that his statement was correct, nor did he believe that a theory's popularity among the learned made it immune to criticism. He was ready to take an argument apart and examine its premises, even when it came to the views of the great philosophers, foremost among them al-Farabi and Avicenna (Ibn Sina), who had a wide influence on Islamic and Latin philosophy. This critical spirit allows us to draw a useful comparison with later Western philosophical traditions, in which examining the foundations of knowledge became an essential part of philosophers' work. But we should not confuse similarity of method with proof of direct historical influence. If two thinkers criticize arguments that seem certain, this does not mean that one took from the other, especially when their contexts are far apart and the problems each is trying to solve are different. Al-Ghazali offered an important example that the critique of philosophy can come from within philosophical knowledge itself. He used logic in his works and considered it a useful tool for disciplining reasoning, and he did not treat everything philosophy produced as false merely because it came from the philosophers. His basic objection was not to the exercise of reason, but to certain conclusions he believed had not been proven to the degree their proponents claimed. This detail is essential for understanding his place in the history of thought. Al-Ghazali was not an enemy of reason, nor was he a defender of its unlimited authority. He wanted to define its field of work, to distinguish between sound reasoning and claims that hide behind the language of proof, and to prevent confusion between what reason can prove and what needs other premises that philosophical proof alone cannot provide. This position made his works material open to discussion outside their original setting, because the question of the validity of proof, the limits of reasoning, and the relationship between religion and philosophy was not specific to Muslims. These issues also occupied Christian and Jewish thinkers in the Middle Ages, even if the answers differed according to schools of thought and historical circumstances. Islamic ideas did not reach medieval Europe by a single route, nor was their transmission the result of constant direct contact between thinkers belonging to two different cultures. The translation movement from Arabic into Latin helped carry philosophical and scientific works into European settings, and in the twelfth century Toledo emerged as an important center of this activity. The translated books allowed European readers to learn about a philosophical heritage formed through the interaction of Greek thought with the contributions of Muslim philosophers, and which then developed within the Islamic schools themselves. In this context, al-Ghazali entered Latin culture through the translation of his book The Aims of the Philosophers, which circulated in Europe's learned circles during the Middle Ages, and interest in it continued in later periods. But the story of this book carries an important detail that reveals how the meaning of an intellectual work can change when it moves from one language to another. In The Aims of the Philosophers, al-Ghazali gave an organized presentation of the philosophers' views on logic, physics and metaphysics, and his purpose was to pave the way for criticizing them in The Incoherence of the Philosophers. However, the Latin translation did not clearly convey all the indications that explain the nature of this presentation and its relation to the author's critical position. As a result, a number of European thinkers read the book as an account of al-Ghazali's own doctrine, not merely an organized presentation of the philosophers' views. Thus al-Ghazali appeared, in part of the Latin tradition, as an expositor of Aristotle's philosophy as it had arrived through Avicenna, even though his intellectual profile in the Islamic world was far more complex. He was at once a student of philosophy, a critic of some of its conclusions, a theologian defending specific religious conceptions, and a thinker investigating the limits of knowledge and the paths to certainty. This paradox is not a minor detail in the history of translation; it shows that the transfer of books does not guarantee the full transfer of their authors' intentions. A translated text may keep the information and the arguments, yet lose some of the context that determines how they are understood. An author may be credited with a position he does not hold, or his views may be understood through an intellectual classification to which he never belonged. Even so, the European reading of al-Ghazali was not worthless because of this confusion. His book helped introduce Latin readers to the subjects of logic and philosophy that had developed in the Islamic world. When we speak of Western thought in the Middle Ages, we are speaking of an intellectual world in which universities were taking shape, and the relationship between Christian philosophy and the legacy of Aristotle was the subject of wide debate. European thinkers faced questions about the possibility of reconciling faith and proof, how to understand nature and the world, the limits of human knowledge, and the relationship between what can be proven by reason and what religious doctrine establishes. These questions were not new to al-Ghazali, even if their formulations and religious frameworks differed. He too lived in an environment where the interaction between religion and philosophy was a subject of dispute, and he had to define his position on the philosophers' sciences and explain what he saw as a conflict between some of their views and the requirements of Islamic doctrine. The logic al-Ghazali dealt with was not the monopoly of any one religious creed, and questions about the validity of reasoning do not lose their importance when the language in which they are discussed changes. Moreover, an organized presentation of philosophical doctrines makes a text useful even to a reader who does not agree with the author on all the conclusions he reaches. A number of European thinkers knew The Aims of the Philosophers, and it became part of the knowledge available to them about the philosophy that had developed in the Islamic world. It was read for centuries and was a source for some of the information relied on by great scholars, among them Albert the Great (1200-1280), the greatest German theologian and philosopher of the Middle Ages, and his student Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), as they studied Arabic philosophy. But we must distinguish between using a book as a source of knowledge and adopting its author as a final authority in philosophy. A philosopher may benefit from an author in explaining a theory or presenting an argument, then disagree with him about its conclusions. A book's influence in supplying information or defining terms may be greater than its influence in shaping the philosophical position itself. This distinction is important and necessary when speaking of al-Ghazali and Aquinas. The presence of al-Ghazali's works among the materials known to philosophers of the Latin tradition does not mean that Aquinas's philosophy grew out of his ideas, or that Aquinas's position on the relationship between reason and faith repeated al-Ghazali's. Each had his own religious background, philosophical sources and particular problems. But studying the environment in which Aquinas worked requires recognizing that medieval European philosophy did not take shape in isolation from intellectual production that arose outside Latin Europe. The Arab-Islamic heritage was one of the important components of this environment, and its role was not limited to passing on Greek philosophy as it was. Muslim philosophers reformulated its questions, developed new arguments, debated its conclusions, and offered conceptions that in turn became subjects of translation and criticism. Al-Ghazali was part of this movement, both when he presented the philosophers' ideas and when he objected to them. Al-Ghazali left a deep and hidden imprint on the course of modern Western philosophy, specifically on the philosophical foundations laid by Ren Descartes (1596-1650). Al-Ghazali's book "Deliverance from Error" marked a turning point through its use of methodical doubt to arrive at certain truth, the very path Descartes followed literally in his famous "Meditations." Al-Ghazali freed himself from inherited assumptions and doubted the senses and reason until he reached absolute certainty, thereby paving the way for Descartes to coin his immortal statement, "I think, therefore I am." This reflects a deep historical and intellectual influence that highlights the unity of the human concern with the search for pure certainty, free from the captivity of blind imitation. Among the most prominent questions that have made al-Ghazali present in comparisons between Islamic and Western thought is the relationship between reason and faith. He refused to let belonging to a religious community, or adopting a popular opinion, take the place of examination, just as he refused to treat every philosophical claim as truth merely because it was cast in the form of a proof. The solution he offered was not based on doing without reason, but on recognizing its functions and limits and distinguishing between fields of knowledge. Logic, in his view, is a useful tool for disciplining reasoning, but it does not make all questions provable in the same way. The heritage that reached Europe included different currents: some defended the possibility of reconciling reason and revelation, some reconsidered how independent philosophy is from theology, and some used philosophical criticism as a means of defending doctrine. In this context, al-Ghazali's works provided material that could be drawn on or opposed, depending on the question each thinker was discussing. But we should be aware that similarity in questions does not cancel difference in answers. Al-Ghazali did not seek to establish a secular philosophy in the modern sense, and his project was not to separate knowledge from religion. Rather, he wanted to reach what he saw as a correct understanding of religion, while examining the methods a person can rely on in seeking the truth. Looking at the history of al-Ghazali's reception in the West, we can distinguish three levels of influence: The first level: direct textual influence, which consists of the transfer of his works into Latin and their reading in European intellectual circles. This level is the clearest historically, because we can trace the translated book, the name by which its author was known, and some of the circles in which it circulated. The Aims of the Philosophers in particular helped introduce Latin readers to aspects of Arabic philosophy, even if their understanding of it was sometimes affected by the absence of some of the indications explaining the nature of the book and its author's purpose. The second level: influence that passes through overlapping philosophical debates. Al-Ghazali's ideas entered into dialogue with the ideas of other philosophers, and responses to his critique appeared in the works of Averroes, Ibn Rushd the grandson (520-595 AH / 1126-1198 CE). The subjects of Islamic philosophy also reached Europe through many authors. But proving that a specific idea reached a Western philosopher along this path requires historical evidence, and it cannot be assumed on the basis of similarity alone. The third level: comparative presence in the history of philosophy. At this level, a researcher can compare al-Ghazali and Descartes on the problem of certainty, al-Ghazali and David Hume (1711-1776) on causality, or al-Ghazali's treatment of ethics and some Western currents on the formation of character. This last level is especially important in contemporary studies, because it allows al-Ghazali to be read outside the narrow limits of the internal history of Islamic thought without losing his historical specificity. He is not merely a religious figure studied to understand the development of theology and Sufism, nor a passing name to be added to a list of philosophers who preceded Europe's thinkers and influenced them. He is the author of a relatively integrated project in which the theory of knowledge meets philosophical criticism, moral education and the search for certainty. Al-Ghazali was indeed present in the history of European philosophical reading during the Middle Ages, and his book The Aims of the Philosophers was among the texts that helped carry knowledge of Islamic philosophy into Latin. Al-Ghazali preceded Descartes on methodical doubt and preceded Hume on causality. What al-Ghazali offered in analyzing knowledge, criticizing arguments, investigating the relationship between reason and faith, and reviewing human motives is enough to make him one of the great philosophers in history, and enough to make his works worthy of study in a global context. Al-Ghazali lived within specific traditions of knowledge and was occupied with questions connected to religion, philosophy, certainty and ethics. He studied the philosophers' views before criticizing them, used logic while keeping a critical position on the limits of reasoning, and went through a personal and intellectual experience that pushed him to reconsider the nature of the knowledge he was seeking. These aspects do not make him an early copy of any Western philosopher; rather, they give him his own place in the history of human thought. Perhaps what most deserves attention in al-Ghazali's experience is that he was not content to ask whether ideas were true; he was also concerned with the condition of the person who seeks them. He realized that knowing an argument does not necessarily mean possessing certainty, that the ability to reason does not solve all the problems a person faces, and that reforming behavior is not achieved merely by memorizing moral rules. In his project he combined the examination of knowledge with self-examination, without dissolving one field into the other. Al-Ghazali's value in Western thought does not lie in offering a simple story about a Muslim thinker who came before the West, but in revealing the real presence of Islamic philosophy in the history of European knowledge, and the ability of an eleventh-century thinker to address questions that remained subjects of research and debate for centuries after his time. Here is a quick comparison between Imam al-Ghazali and the thirty greatest Western philosophers and thinkers who came after him: 1. The Dominican philosopher and Catholic priest Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in reconciling rational philosophy with religious doctrine, and in showing that human reason is a limited tool that cannot on its own grasp the great truths of faith without the guidance of divine revelation. 2. The Italian philosopher Niccol Machiavelli (1469-1527). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in studying political reality, the conduct of rulers, the mechanisms of power, and political advice. 3. The German philosopher and priest Martin Luther (1483-1546). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in criticizing intellectual rigidity and the blind imitation of religious institutions, and in calling for the liberation of reason from the authority of inherited tradition, in order to revive the essence of pure faith and return to the springs of certainty, thus laying the first stones of an intellectual revolution that came before the European Renaissance. 4. The English philosopher Francis Bacon (1561-1626). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in his sharp criticism of barren methods of reasoning, his call for scientific doubt and a detached experimental method, and his fight against inherited ideas and blind imitation, in order to cleanse the mind of illusions and reach the bare truth and sound, certain knowledge. 5. The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in founding the "social contract," explaining the need for a strong ruling authority to preserve order, prevent chaos and avert conflict among people, studying human nature, and laying the foundations of theories of authority, politics and ethics and their role in restraining human instincts and preserving the social order. 6. The French philosopher Ren Descartes (1596-1650). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in taking methodical doubt as the path to absolute certainty, stripping the senses and reason of absolute trust until he reached the fixed truth. 7. The French philosopher and physicist Blaise Pascal (1623-1662). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in proving the utter inability of human reason to grasp divine truths on its own, and in calling for a faith based on the experience of the heart and inner feeling, not on logical proofs alone. 8. The Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in taking apart and refuting the philosophical idea of "the unity of being," discussing its roots and its doctrinal dangers in his writings before Spinoza adopted it in his philosophical system. 9. The English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in establishing that the human mind is born a blank slate, free of imprinted ideas or innate knowledge, and that learning and knowledge are acquired exclusively through the senses and experience. 10. The German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in saying that this world God created is the best of all possible worlds, the most perfect in wisdom and order, ruled by divine justice and the most perfect governance, beyond which nothing more wondrous or better can be imagined. 11. The German philosopher Christian Wolff (1679-1754). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in establishing a strict method of classifying the sciences based on logical proof and organized rational foundations, clearly distinguishing between the fields of religious and philosophical knowledge while affirming that reason and proof are integrated within one coherent system of knowledge. 12. The Irish philosopher and bishop George Berkeley (1685-1753). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in stripping matter of independence, holding that the real existence of visible things depends on the divine will and the continuous governance of the Creator of the universe, that material things lack independent existence of their own, and that their reality is bound up with their being known and perceived by God, who sustains them through His eternal existence. 13. The Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711-1776). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in criticizing the law of cause and effect, affirming that what we see as a repeated coincidence of events does not necessarily mean a necessary causal link between them, but is merely a mental habit. 14. The Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in holding sacred the pure innate nature of human beings, warning of the corrupting effect of environment, society and custom on a person's childhood and nature, and establishing that the reform of human society begins with the moral education of individuals and the purification of souls, affirming that sound human nature is the basis for correcting human behavior before laws and social systems are drafted. 15. The German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in proving the inability of human reason to grasp purely divine and unseen truths, affirming that human knowledge stops at the limits of the senses and has boundaries it cannot cross. 16. The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in showing that the reality of the material world is an illusory and deceptive appearance that hides the greater truth behind it, calling for renunciation of worldly desires and the liberation of the soul from the captivity of material wants to reach spiritual peace. This shows that the Muslim mind's view of the falseness of material appearances came before the insight of modern Western philosophers. 17. The French philosopher Auguste Comte (1798-1857). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in classifying the types of human knowledge and dividing the theoretical and practical sciences by their importance in human life and their benefit to society, affirming that the sciences are closely tied to human purposes and happiness in this world and the next. 18. The English philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in establishing that the standard for the soundness of human actions and their moral judgments rests on bringing benefits to people and warding off harm from them, drawing on the higher purposes of Islamic law in protecting human interests, long before modern utilitarian theories appeared. 19. The Danish philosopher S ren Kierkegaard (1813-1855). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in the experience of existential anxiety that shakes the certainty of reason and the reliability of the senses, and in concluding that escape from this perplexity comes not through philosophical proofs but through a brave "leap of faith" by which the individual crosses to the pure certainty of the heart. 20. The German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in criticizing the human alienation tied to excessive attachment to money, when he explained that a person's greed and submission to material things make him a prisoner of what he owns. 21. The American philosopher William James (1842-1910). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in studying an "experiential psychology of faith," analyzing the psychological and emotional states and inner struggles of the human heart with astonishing precision, adopting a practical and experiential method, and showing that the truth of religious and spiritual ideas is measured by their fruits and beneficial psychological effects in human life, not by theoretical proofs alone. 22. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in criticizing moral and social hypocrisy and exposing the hidden motives of souls, affirming that many of people's moral judgments spring from concealed psychological motives, such as the pursuit of status, praise and personal interest, and are not a genuine commitment to virtue. 23. The English philosopher Francis Herbert Bradley (1846-1924). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in regarding the sensible world and outward reason as mere contradictory illusions that do not reveal the greater truth, and in holding that the sensible world and empirical reality lose their independence and fade away before the majesty of the absolute divine truth. 24. The German philosopher Edmund Husserl (1859-1938). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in adopting the method of "suspending judgment," in which the senses and the self-evident truths of reason are placed under doubt and temporary questioning, turning toward pure self-consciousness to reach the root of a certainty beyond all doubt. 25. The French philosopher Henri Bergson (1859-1941). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in proving that the greatest knowledge and absolute certainty are grasped through the intuition of the heart and spiritual unveiling, and not through purely logical rational analysis alone. 26. The English philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872-1970). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in dismantling "inherited dogmatism," affirming that accepting beliefs because of collective tradition is an epistemic disease that prevents reaching independent truth. 27. The Austrian-British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in examining the limits of language and the inability of human expression to encompass absolute truths, affirming that what words cannot express is grasped through the direct tasting of the heart, not through expression: "Whoever tastes, knows; and whoever knows, draws deeply." 28. The German philosopher Martin Heidegger (1889-1976). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in criticizing "the forgetting of being," revealing early on the alienation of human beings through their absorption in the material and everyday appearances of the world, and warning that this heedlessness hides from consciousness the reality of authentic existence and its deeper meaning, tied to the absolute divine origin. 29. The Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper (1902-1994). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in affirming the principle of "fallibility" in human knowledge, holding that human reason, however precise it becomes, remains exposed to illusion and error unless it rests on a light that God casts into the heart, one that goes beyond the limits of empirical and logical reasoning. 30. The French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in analyzing the concepts of human will, freedom and choice, and the individual's responsibility for his actions and decisions, holding that it is the individual who determines his own fate and morals by his free and independent will. 31. The French philosopher Michel Foucault (1926-1984). Imam al-Ghazali preceded him in dismantling the authority of discourses and institutions of knowledge, showing through his critique of sects and schools how knowledge and religious or intellectual discourse can sometimes turn into a tool of domination, prestige and self-justifying practices. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Dismantling the Palestinian Authority: Political Maneuver or Israeli Strategy?]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12870/Dismantling-the-Palestinian-Authority%3A-Political-Maneuver-or-Israeli-Strategy%3F?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12870/Dismantling-the-Palestinian-Authority%3A-Political-Maneuver-or-Israeli-Strategy%3F?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:46:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu's threat to dismantle the Palestinian Authority cannot be read as a mere electoral maneuver or demagogic rhetoric aimed at winning votes on the Israeli right. Behind this threat, deeper shifts are taking shape in Israeli political and security thinking. They show that the idea of ending the Palestinian Authority, and liquidating the institutional structure that emerged from the Oslo Accords, has moved from a demand embraced by the far right to an option now present in the wider political debate, including forces on the right and center-right such as Avigdor Lieberman and Naftali Bennett. The danger of this shift is that dismantling the Authority is no longer just an ideological slogan; it has become part of the debate over the future of governing the Palestinians, the limits of a political settlement, and the nature of Israeli control over the land. The issue thus goes beyond partisan disputes over the shape of the next government and touches a strategic question: Can Israel rid itself of the political and institutional obligations imposed by the Oslo era while keeping the advantages of security and administrative control that the Palestinian Authority provided? From liquidating Oslo to searching for an alternative Over the past decades, Israeli governments have treated the Palestinian Authority as a framework that performs security and civil functions, without this meaning Israeli acceptance of an independent Palestinian state. This arrangement allowed Israel to keep control over key levers in the Palestinian territories while handing part of the administrative and service burdens to Palestinian institutions. But the rise of right-wing tendencies in Israel, the shrinking chances of a political settlement, and growing calls to impose Israeli sovereignty over parts of the West Bank have brought the Authority's future back as a strategic issue. For the far right, the Authority is one of the political outcomes of the Oslo Accords, which it seeks to end. For other currents, the threat to dismantle it may be tied to reshaping the Palestinian political and security environment and imposing new facts on the ground without offering a real horizon for national independence. Even so, the convergence of these positions does not necessarily mean an Israeli consensus on the mechanisms or timing of dismantling the Authority. There is a difference between wanting to weaken the Authority politically and institutionally, and deciding to bring it down and bear the consequences of its collapse. The dilemma of the alternative and the cost of collapse Israel faces a basic dilemma: How can it end the Palestinian Authority without directly bearing responsibility for governing millions of Palestinians in the West Bank? The collapse of Palestinian institutions could place broad security, administrative and economic burdens on Israel, including managing civil affairs, providing basic services, and dealing with a political and security vacuum whose repercussions could extend beyond the West Bank. Dismantling the Authority's agencies and institutions could also lead to a more turbulent environment, raise the likelihood of confrontation on the ground, and expose Israel to mounting international criticism and pressure. Hence, gradually weakening the Authority may seem less costly than bringing it down by a direct decision. This includes cutting its financial resources, obstructing its ability to provide services, and widening the restrictions on its political and geographic movement, eroding its legitimacy and institutional effectiveness. Yet these paths, even if they can be analyzed as tools of pressure, do not on their own prove the existence of a unified and comprehensive Israeli plan for dismantling the Authority. The paradox is that weakening the Authority may achieve Israeli political goals in the short term, but it may at the same time undermine the very tools Israel relies on to manage the existing reality, and create a vacuum whose consequences are hard to control. The American factor and the limits of Israeli maneuvering The future of the Palestinian Authority cannot be separated from the nature of the relationship between the Israeli government and the U.S. administration. How far Washington accepts dismantling the Authority, or continues to support its institutions, is an influential factor in Israel's calculations, especially as the Palestinian file is tied to U.S. regional interests, security and stability arrangements, and efforts to reshape the Middle East. American support may give the Netanyahu government wider room to maneuver, while American objection to the Authority's collapse, or fear of its regional repercussions, may raise the cost of moving from political threat to implementation. But the American position is not the only factor; it intersects with the calculations of the Israeli security establishment, the interests of the settlers, the balances within ruling coalitions, and the likelihood of escalation in the West Bank. Accordingly, dismantling the Authority is not necessarily an inevitable path, but it is a possibility that grows stronger as the chances of a settlement shrink and the gap widens between the functions the Authority performs and the limits imposed on its political capacity. The Palestinian wager: from institutional survival to rebuilding the national project In the face of these shifts, it is not enough for Palestinians to count on Israel's need for the Authority to continue, or to assume that the security and administrative cost of its collapse will stop Tel Aviv from pressing ahead with weakening it. These calculations may postpone the decision, but they offer no guarantee that the status quo will continue. The real challenge lies in moving from a strategy of preserving institutions as an end in themselves to rebuilding their legitimacy and national function. This requires reforming the political system, rebuilding the Palestine Liberation Organization on representative and democratic foundations, restoring national unity, and crafting an inclusive strategy that links political and diplomatic work with popular steadfastness and civil resistance, and restores the value of accountability and public participation. The future of the Palestinian Authority should not be reduced to the binary of its survival or collapse, but to its ability to become part of a national project with popular legitimacy and a clear political horizon. In the end, dismantling the Authority may be a postponed Israeli option, but it is neither an inevitable fate nor a cost-free process. The most important question is not only how Israel will deal with the dilemma of the day after the Authority's collapse, but how Palestinians can break free from dependence on a political system whose conditions of survival Israel controls. Meeting this challenge begins with rebuilding Palestinian national capacity, so that ending Palestinian institutions would be powerless to end the cause these institutions were created to represent on behalf of their people. Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Passport Is Gone, but the Homeland Remains]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12869/The-Passport-Is-Gone%2C-but-the-Homeland-Remains?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12869/The-Passport-Is-Gone%2C-but-the-Homeland-Remains?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[A passport was never just papers waiting for a mysterious stamp or an unknown date of return. It was a dream folded between its pages, one the heart reached before the eyes did. Its white pages hid great hopes between their silent lines, and at its end lay scattered symbols that seemed like codes waiting for someone to unlock their secrets... But... who can break their code? What had been held in was broken and slipped out of control, except for one symbol that looked like a key with no fixed direction, no color and no date. It seemed like a wooden key worn out by attempts to open a door that never answered, a door that had sworn to stand firm on its land. Then hope began to withdraw little by little, drawing lines of no return to the self, and wishes began to seep away through the scattered sands of a lifetime, pleading: Is there a rescuer to bind the wounds of time and of every stumble?! That key was not like any other key. It resembled my grandmother's key, the key that has carried the story of a deliverance postponed for decades, searching for a spark of hope and a certainty yet to be witnessed... Whenever I held the passport in my hands, I would soar high, sketching the features of a glory to come, writing equations that need no numbers. I longed for songs tied to the stations of my life, for the sanctity of feelings in a passing moment, for the spirit of harmony... I watch my city from above, like a slaughtered bird circling it, a city like no other. I always wished it would be a city of peace. To its north lies a coastal plain covered with ears of wheat made of wishes, and with spikenard flowers; to its east, mountains that bear witness to hearts leaving it, year after year... I used to believe the passport was a gateway to a world of forgetting, a passage to a promising future without fire. I saw it as a document that would give life back its meaning and open the doors to move between love and loyalty, gratitude to God and thankfulness... I thought, and I thought, and my hopes were dashed when I lost my passport in the rubble of my home... as if it were a sign from God telling me to stay in my homeland. After soaring high, I fell, unawares, to a stray bullet that struck me down, slain by my own illusions... It is a single moment that separates me from death, and it has made me live in a deception I called time. It is a moment in which the past breaks apart into scattered hallucinations across many squares, and the memorials hang suspended. It is a moment when the chase after a mirage stops, and one holds on to reality however and wherever it is. I have nothing to say but "God is the One whose help is sought." The passport vanished under the rubble, carrying many hopes and even more pain, buried beneath the ruins, and what remains are the remnants of delirium... I searched for it in my own ruins and the ruins of my house. I spoke to it as if it could hear me: Where are you? Why did you disappear?! I reproach the rubble: What do I do now? The cornerstone has been destroyed, the first step toward building the highest edifice. I have become a body without a soul, days gathered inside an envelope waiting to be sent, not thrown away. When every attempt to find the passport failed, I realized the earth had embraced it and declared the end of an entire chapter of my life... And I still believe that endings are only beginnings taking shape in secret. Perhaps the beautiful beginning starts here...!! Ghada Ayesh KhaderNorth Gaza Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[On the Ballot: Arab and Muslim Candidates and Positions on Palestine in the 2026 Midterms]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12868/On-the-Ballot%3A-Arab-and-Muslim-Candidates-and-Positions-on-Palestine-in-the-2026-Midterms?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12868/On-the-Ballot%3A-Arab-and-Muslim-Candidates-and-Positions-on-Palestine-in-the-2026-Midterms?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 22:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[Alhawadeth Politics Monitor (APM) - Analytical Reading APM-ANL-003 An analytical inventory of the 2026 midterm elections Approved version - October 26, 2026 Election day November 3, 2026 Muslims on the ballot At least 51 candidates, in about 23 states [1] Running for Congress 11: one for the Senate and 10 for the House [1] Party breakdown 40 Democrats, 4 Republicans, 2 independents, 1 Green, 4 in nonpartisan races [1] Candidates of Palestinian descent At least 5: Tlaib, Jodeh, Romman, Kawas, Rashid [29, 32] Methodological note This inventory separates three categories that may meet in one person but are not interchangeable: identity (Arab or Muslim), political orientation (progressive or otherwise), and position on Palestine. The Monitor does not classify any candidate as supporting or opposing genocide; the word "genocide" is reported when the candidate uses it, and is distinguished from calls for a ceasefire or for halting or conditioning arms to Israel, in line with Article 13 of the Monitor's Constitution. The count of Muslim candidates comes from an inventory compiled by Muslim Network TV, which by its own method is a floor, not an official census [1]. Endorsements are the positions of the endorsing organizations, not judgments of the Monitor. Where no documented information exists, this is stated explicitly. 01 The Overall Picture Muslim Network TV identified at least 51 Muslim candidates in the November 3 elections, running for Congress, state legislatures, county offices and the judiciary [1]. The outlet screened candidate listings and cross-checked them against the voter guides of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Emgage Action, officeholder records and news reporting [1]. It flagged about 50 further names whose religious identity it could not verify and left them out of the count [1]. The candidates are concentrated in Minnesota (8), Michigan (6) and Texas (4), followed by New York, Georgia, Connecticut and Illinois (3 each) [1]. The inventory shows a partisan diversity that rules out treating these candidates as a single bloc: CAIR's political arm backed the opponent of Muslim Republican Zuhdi Jasser in Arizona, and Emgage Action endorsed the Democrat challenging Muslim Republican Imtiaz Mohammad in Florida [1]. 02 The Senate: Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan Candidate Abdul El-Sayed (Democrat) - facing Mike Rogers (Republican) [3] Path to the nomination Won the Democratic primary on August 5, 2026 [2] Historic dimension If elected, he would be the first Muslim in the U.S. Senate [1] El-Sayed has accused Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza [3], and has called for ending unconditional military aid to Israel [4]. The race's polling and the two candidates' positions on immigration, health insurance and the war on Iran are covered in APM-ANL-001. 03 The House: Ten Muslim Candidates The table below lists the ten candidates as they appear in the Muslim Network TV inventory [1], with each one's most prominent documented position on the war on Gaza where available. Candidate District Status Documented position on the war on Gaza Rashida Tlaib Michigan 12 Democrat, incumbent Introduced a resolution to recognize Israel's assault on Gaza as genocide [5]. (See APM-PRF-001) Ilhan Omar Minnesota 5 Democrat, incumbent Criticized the administration for refusing to acknowledge the genocidal nature of the war and called for halting weapons shipments [6]; original cosponsor of the Block the Bombs Act [7] Andr Carson Indiana 7 Democrat, incumbent Original cosponsor of the Block the Bombs Act [7] Lateefah Simon California 12 Democrat, incumbent [2] Endorsed by A New Policy PAC, which backs a new U.S. policy toward Palestine [21] Aisha Wahab California 14 Democrat, holding the seat since an August 2026 special election [10] Answered "yes" when asked whether she considers what is happening to Palestinians a genocide [10] Adam Hamawy New Jersey 12 Democrat, open seat Supports a full arms embargo on Israel and the right of return; opposes funding for the Iron Dome system [12] Darializa Avila Chevalier New York 13 Democrat, unseated an incumbent in the primary [14] Arrested at a protest against Senators Schumer and Gillibrand's support for arms sales to Israel [15] Zuhdi Jasser Arizona 4 Republican, challenging the incumbent [16] No public position on the war on Gaza found in the sources reviewed Ahsen Mujeeb Malik Virginia 10 Independent [1] None found in the sources reviewed Alaha Ahrar Virginia 7 Independent [1] None found in the sources reviewed Cases worth a closer look ▸ Aisha Wahab: won the August 20, 2026 special election to finish the term of former Rep. Eric Swalwell, and faces the same opponent, Melissa Hernandez, on November 3 for the full term [10]. Groups affiliated with AIPAC spent millions of dollars supporting her opponent [10]. She is the first Afghan American elected to public office in the United States [10]. ▸ Adam Hamawy: a surgeon and former U.S. Army officer, he won the Democratic primary on June 2, 2026 with about 27% of the vote in a 13-candidate field, and faces Republican Gregg Mele for the seat being vacated by Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman [11]. He volunteered as a doctor in Gaza in 2024 [13], and if elected would be New Jersey's first Muslim member of Congress [1]. His endorsers include CAIR Action, Emgage Action, Justice Democrats and A New Policy PAC [24]. ▸ Zuhdi Jasser: a Syrian-born physician [17], he founded the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, which holds that Islam should not shape state government [16]. He faces Democratic Rep. Greg Stanton and No Labels Party nominee Tisha Benoit [17]. His presence on the list confirms that religious identity does not determine political position. Geographic note Adam Hamawy's district is the 12th (the Princeton-Trenton area), not Paterson's. Paterson lies in the 9th District - see Section 08. 04 The Progressive Wing: The Newcomers The 2026 primaries saw several progressive candidates defeat incumbents or candidates backed by party leaders. Belonging to this wing does not imply a uniform position on Palestine, so a position is listed only where it is documented. Candidate District Primary result Documented position on the war on Gaza Darializa Avila Chevalier New York 13 Defeated Rep. Adriano Espaillat [14] See Section 03 Claire Valdez New York 7 Defeated Antonio Reynoso and others for an open seat [14] None found in the sources reviewed Brad Lander New York 10 Defeated Rep. Daniel Goldman [14] None found in the sources reviewed Chris Rabb Pennsylvania 3 Won with backing from Justice Democrats, DSA and the pro-Palestine super PAC American Priorities [15] No direct statement found in the sources reviewed Melat Kiros Colorado 1 Unseated Rep. Diana DeGette [15] Endorsed by A New Policy PAC [20] William Lawrence Michigan 7 Defeated Bridget Brink and Matt Maasdam; faces Republican Tom Barrett in a swing district [18] Calls for ending arms sales to Israel [19]; endorsed by A New Policy PAC [20] Donavan McKinney Michigan 13 Unseated Rep. Shri Thanedar [19] None found in the sources reviewed Analilia Mejia New Jersey 11 Beat former Rep. Tom Malinowski in the special primary, then won the April 16, 2026 special election; in office since April 20; faces Republican Joe Hathaway again in November [36] Has said she believes Israel is committing genocide in Gaza [36]; does not oppose aid to Israel but rejects giving it without conditions [37] 05 Supporters of Palestinian Rights: Verifiable Indicators Instead of a general label, the Monitor relies on three indicators that readers can verify for themselves: A) Sponsorship of the Block the Bombs Act (H.R. 3565) Introduced in May 2025 under the lead of Rep. Delia Ramirez, the bill requires Congress to approve, by joint resolution, the transfer of certain offensive weapons to Israel [8]. Its original cosponsors on May 21, 2025 included: Sara Jacobs, Pramila Jayapal, Mark Pocan, Becca Balint, Andr Carson, Greg Casar, Lloyd Doggett, Veronica Escobar, Maxwell Frost, Jes s "Chuy" Garc a, Jonathan Jackson, Hank Johnson, Summer Lee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley [7]. B) Public use of the word "genocide" ▸ Rashida Tlaib: introduced a resolution recognizing the genocide in Gaza [5]. ▸ Summer Lee (Pennsylvania 12): described Israel's operations in Gaza as genocide and called for an arms embargo, in March 2025 [9]. ▸ Abdul El-Sayed [3], Aisha Wahab [10] and Analilia Mejia (New Jersey 11) [36]. ▸ At the state level: Iman Jodeh [31] and Aber Kawas [30]. C) Endorsement by A New Policy PAC This committee backs federal candidates who call for a new U.S. policy toward Israel and Palestine. Names documented in its 2026 lists include: Lateefah Simon, Ro Khanna, Randy Villegas and Sara Jacobs (California) [21]; Jonathan Jackson and Delia Ramirez (Illinois) [22]; Jim McGovern and Ayanna Pressley (Massachusetts) [23]; Adam Hamawy [24]; Melat Kiros, William Lawrence and Jamie Raskin [20]. These are the organization's endorsements, not an independent judgment by the Monitor. 06 The Governors' Races Thirty-nine governorships are on the ballot in 2026, with 18 incumbents seeking re-election [25]. A governor runs the executive branch of a state, while military aid and foreign policy remain with Congress and the President. State Democratic nominee Republican nominee Michigan Jocelyn Benson John James [25] New York Kathy Hochul Bruce Blakeman [25] California Xavier Becerra Steve Hilton [25] Colorado Phil Weiser Victor Marx [27] Minnesota Amy Klobuchar Lisa Demuth [25] Georgia Keisha Lance Bottoms Rick Jackson [25] Florida David Jolly Byron Donalds [25] New Mexico Deb Haaland Gregg Hull [26] Connecticut Ned Lamont Ryan Fazio [25] Maryland Wes Moore Dan Cox [26] The Muslim Network TV inventory includes no Muslim candidate for governor; the only Muslim candidate for statewide office is Shehla Faizi, the Green Party nominee for Texas comptroller [1]. Ruwa Romman had run for governor of Georgia, then withdrew on February 25, 2026 to run for the state Senate [28]. Limits of this section The Monitor has not yet reviewed the gubernatorial nominees' positions on the war on Gaza or on their states' anti-boycott laws, and no position should be inferred from the absence of information here. An earlier draft stated that Erik Underwood, the Approval Voting Party nominee in Colorado [27], describes the war as genocide; the Monitor could not verify this, so it was excluded. 07 State Legislatures: The Arab and Palestinian Presence Candidate Office Documented information Abbas Alawieh Michigan Senate, District 2 (Dearborn) Co-founder of the 2024 "Uncommitted" protest movement [1] Alabas Farhat Michigan House, District 3 Democratic candidate [1] Jalal Abdallah Michigan House, District 15 Democratic candidate [1] Aber Kawas New York Senate, District 12 (Queens) Of Palestinian descent; if elected, the first Palestinian American in the state legislature [1, 29]; describes what is happening in Palestine as genocide [30] Ruwa Romman Georgia Senate, District 7 Born in Jordan to a Palestinian family whose grandparents were displaced in the 1948 Nakba [29] Iman Jodeh Colorado Senate, District 29 First Palestinian American elected in Colorado; appointed to the state Senate in 2025 [29]; has described the war as genocide since 2023 [31] Abdelnasser Rashid Illinois House, District 21 First Palestinian American in the Illinois House [32] Note: Muslim Network TV counted four candidates of Palestinian descent (Tlaib, Jodeh, Romman, Kawas) [29]; Abdelnasser Rashid is added according to his official biography [32]. 08 What Is on the Paterson Ballot? Office Candidates Notes U.S. Senate (New Jersey) Cory Booker (Democrat, incumbent) - Justin Murphy (Republican) [33] New Jersey has not elected a Republican senator since 1972 [33] U.S. House - 9th District Nellie Pou (Democrat, incumbent) - Rosie Pino (Republican) [34] Pou has declined to call events in Gaza a genocide [35]. See APM-PRF-005 and APM-PRF-006 09 Analytical Conclusions ▸ Identity is not position: the inventory includes a Muslim Republican whose opponent was backed by Muslim organizations [1], and progressive candidates with no documented position on Gaza. ▸ The war on Gaza has become a measurable electoral axis: AIPAC-affiliated groups spent millions against Aisha Wahab [10], and candidates have publicly used the word genocide or called for an arms embargo [3, 10, 12]. ▸ The sharper journalistic question is not "Who supports Palestine?" but: What exactly is the position? When was it stated? Has it become a vote or the sponsorship of legislation? ▸ Gaps to fill: the gubernatorial nominees' positions; the positions of Claire Valdez, Brad Lander and Donavan McKinney; and the independent candidates in Virginia. 10 Reference Guide [1] From Senate to city hall - Muslims on 2026 midterms ballot. Muslim Network TV, 20/10/2026. https://www.muslimnetwork.tv/muslim-americans-seek-historic-gains-in-us-midterms/ [2] A record Muslim slate advances toward the US midterms. Muslim Network TV, Aug 2026. https://www.muslimnetwork.tv/a-record-muslim-slate-advances-toward-the-us-midterms/ [3] Abdul El-Sayed wins Michigan's Democratic Senate primary. NBC News (via NBC New York), Aug 2026. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/abdul-el-sayed-wins-michigan-democratic-senate-primary/6533783/ [4] Abdul El-Sayed (primary report). Israel National News, Aug 2026. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/431268 [5] US lawmakers introduce resolution to recognize Israel's assault on Gaza as genocide. JURIST, Nov 2025. https://www.jurist.org/news/2025/11/us-lawmakers-introduce-resolution-to-recognize-israels-assault-on-gaza-as-genocide/ [6] Ilhan Omar: Blinken Humiliated by His Talks in Israel. Al-Quds, 23/8/2024. https://alquds.com/en/posts/133209 [7] Cosponsors of the "Block the Bombs" Act (H.R. 3565). American Jewish Congress (list drawn from Congress.gov), Sep 2025. https://ajcongress.org/jewishpoliticalguide/cosponsors-of-the-block-the-bombs-act-targeting-israel/ [8] Rep. Lee Joins Ramirez, Jacobs, Jayapal, Pocan, Colleagues in Introducing Block the Bombs Act. Office of Rep. Summer Lee, 5/6/2025. https://summerlee.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rep-lee-joins-ramirez-jacobs-jayapal-pocan-colleagues-in-introducing-bill-to-condition-weapons-to-israel-save-lives [9] Far-Left US Lawmakers Blast Israel for Resuming Military Campaign in Gaza. The Algemeiner (pro-Israel outlet; cited for the quoted statements), 19/3/2025. https://www.algemeiner.com/2025/03/19/far-left-us-lawmakers-blast-israel-resuming-military-campaign-gaza-accuse-jewish-state-genocide/ [10] California lawmaker Aisha Wahab wins special election to succeed Eric Swalwell in Congress. Associated Press (via WSB-TV), 20/8/2026. https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/california-lawmaker/WWECPQO25E5KXNSFW6M3NOIRUY/ [11] Army surgeon Adam Hamawy wins crowded New Jersey primary in 12th Congressional District. WHYY, 3/6/2026. https://whyy.org/articles/new-jersey-election-2026-primary-12th-congressional-district-2/ [12] Staunch Israel critic and Gaza trauma surgeon Adam Hamawy wins NJ-12 primary. JTA, 3/6/2026. https://www.jta.org/2026/06/03/politics/staunch-israel-critic-and-gaza-trauma-surgeon-adam-hamawy-wins-nj-12-primary [13] New Jersey's Hamawy Joins Record Muslim Slate Ahead of Midterms. Community News, 2026. https://communitynews.org/sections/news/new-jersey-hamawy-record-muslim-slate-midterms/ [14] New York primary results, June 23, 2026 (NY-7, NY-10, NY-13). Ballotpedia News. https://news.ballotpedia.org/tag/2026-elections/page/4/ [15] Profiles: Lander, Valdez, Rabb, Avila Chevalier, Hamawy, Kiros. Portside, 2026. https://portside.org/node/40212 [16] 2026 Arizona 4th Congressional District race: The candidates. KJZZ, 6/10/2026. https://www.kjzz.org/elections/2026-10-06/2026-arizona-4th-congressional-district-race-the-candidates-elex [17] 2026 Election: Arizona Congressional District 4 candidates face off in debate. FOX 10 Phoenix, Oct 2026. https://fox10phoenix.com/news/2026-election-arizona-congressional-district-4-candidates-face-off-debate [18] William Lawrence defeated Bridget Brink and Matt Maasdam in the Democratic primary for MI-7. Ballotpedia News, 5/8/2026. https://news.ballotpedia.org/2026/08/05/william-lawrence-d-defeated-bridget-brink-d-and-matt-maasdam-d-in-the-democratic-primary-for-michigans-7th-congressional-district-on-august-4-2026/ [19] Socialists triumph in purple Michigan's primaries. The Washington Times, 5/8/2026. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/aug/5/socialists-triumph-purple-michigans-primaries/ [20] A New Policy PAC - endorsement posts (Kiros, Lawrence, Raskin), Jun 2026. https://www.govserv.org/US/Washington-D.C./458807833981507/A-New-Policy [21] A New Policy PAC - California endorsements. Blue Voter Guide, accessed 26/10/2026. https://bluevoterguide.org/endorser-org/A_New_Policy_PAC/CA/9323 [22] A New Policy PAC - Illinois endorsements. Blue Voter Guide, accessed 26/10/2026. https://bluevoterguide.org/endorser-org/A_New_Policy_PAC/IL/9323 [23] A New Policy PAC - Massachusetts endorsements. Blue Voter Guide, accessed 26/10/2026. https://bluevoterguide.org/endorser-org/A_New_Policy_PAC/MA/9323 [24] Adam Hamawy - endorsements, NJ-12 general election. Blue Voter Guide, accessed 26/10/2026. https://bluevoterguide.org/NJ/candidate_Adam_Hamawy/723099 [25] 2026 Gubernatorial Elections. National Governors Association, accessed 26/10/2026. https://www.nga.org/governors/elections/ [26] 2026 Governor Elections: Complete Race and Candidate Guide. Election Central, Oct 2026. https://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2026-governor-elections/ [27] KUNC's 2026 midterm election voter guide for Northern Colorado. KUNC, 28/9/2026. https://www.kunc.org/politics/2026-09-28/kunc-2026-northern-colorado-election-voter-guide [28] Ruwa Romman. Wikipedia, accessed 26/10/2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruwa_Romman [29] The four Palestinian Americans on the US midterm ballot. Muslim Network TV, Oct 2026. https://www.muslimnetwork.tv/the-four-palestinian-americans-on-the-us-midterm-ballot/ [30] Aber Kawas is not concerned about splitting the progressive vote. City & State New York, Nov 2025. https://www.cityandstateny.com/personality/2025/11/aber-kawas-not-concerned-about-splitting-progressive-vote/409738/ [31] Prominent Colorado lawmaker calls Israel war "genocide". Axios Denver, 15/11/2023. https://www.axios.com/local/denver/2023/11/15/colorado-lawmaker-iman-jodeh-israel-palestine-gaza-genocide [32] Representative Abdelnasser Rashid - official biography. Illinois General Assembly, accessed 26/10/2026. https://my.ilga.gov/Member/_Detail/3420 [33] Justin Murphy wins GOP nod to take on Sen. Cory Booker. New Jersey Monitor, 2/6/2026. https://newjerseymonitor.com/2026/06/02/justin-murphy-gop-primary-cory-booker/ [34] Pou (D) and Pino (R) are running in New Jersey's 9th Congressional District. Ballotpedia News, 3/8/2026. https://news.ballotpedia.org/2026/08/03/pou-d-and-pino-r-are-running-in-new-jerseys-9th-congressional-district-one-of-23-trump-won-districts-democrats-are-defending-this-november/ [35] Nellie Pou's tricky balance on Israel and Palestine. New Jersey Globe, 9/9/2025. https://newjerseyglobe.com/congress/nellie-pous-tricky-balance-on-israel-and-palestine/ [36] Analilia Mejia. Wikipedia, accessed 26/10/2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analilia_Mejia [37] Interview with Analilia Mejia (Spanish). Democracy Now!, 19/2/2026. https://www.democracynow.org/es/2026/2/19/tenemos_que_retomar_nuestra_democracia_analilia Translated from the Arabic original by AI.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia Intercepts Missiles and Drones Over Riyadh and Southern Regions]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12867/Saudi-Arabia-Intercepts-Missiles-and-Drones-Over-Riyadh-and-Southern-Regions?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12867/Saudi-Arabia-Intercepts-Missiles-and-Drones-Over-Riyadh-and-Southern-Regions?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Saudi Arabia has reported the interception of several ballistic missiles and drones launched toward its capital city and southern territories. The security operations occurred as efforts were underway to resume international flight schedules at major airports following previous disruptions. While most projectiles were destroyed mid-air, falling debris caused minor injuries and property damage in residential areas, highlighting the ongoing volatility of the regional conflict.In a series of defensive actions, security forces managed to neutralize a ballistic missile heading toward Riyadh early Sunday morning. Additionally, a drone was intercepted in the capital's outskirts, and a cruise missile was destroyed before reaching its intended target in the southwestern city of Khamis Mushait. Residents in Riyadh reported hearing loud explosions as the defense systems engaged the incoming threats. Later reports indicated that ten additional ballistic missiles were intercepted while moving toward the southern parts of the kingdom, illustrating a significant escalation in the scale of the aerial attacks.The Saudi Civil Defense agency confirmed that the destruction of two missiles over Khamis Mushait and Ahad Rafidah resulted in shrapnel falling on civilian neighborhoods. This debris caused injuries to two individuals and led to various degrees of damage to three residential buildings and seven private vehicles. These incidents have added to the concerns regarding civilian safety as the conflict continues to spill over borders. The local authorities have been working to secure the affected sites and provide assistance to those impacted by the falling fragments.These developments coincide with an attempt to restore normalcy at King Khalid International Airport. Officials had recently announced that Terminal 2 would resume international operations, while Terminal 1 would be dedicated to domestic flights. This move followed a period of closure triggered by previous security incidents that resulted in casualties and significant travel disruptions. However, Yahya Saree issued a public warning, stating that the airport remains a target and is considered unsafe for international and local airlines. The warning emphasized that those using the facility do so at their own risk, as the site is viewed as a strategic military location by opposing forces.The broader conflict in Yemen has also intensified, particularly around the strategic city of Taiz. For several weeks, the city has been under a tight siege, with main supply routes to Aden being severed. This has created a dire situation for approximately 800,000 residents who are currently trapped with limited access to essential resources. The United Nations has raised alarms, stating that the window of opportunity to deliver life-saving humanitarian aid is rapidly closing. Meanwhile, ground operations have escalated, with reports of hundreds of casualties on various fronts as both sides struggle for control of key mountainous positions and coastal territories.Amidst the military exchanges, there have been conflicting reports regarding the scope of the targets. While some sources claimed that missiles were intercepted near sensitive religious sites in Mecca and Medina, these claims were flatly denied by Yahya Saree, who labeled such reports as inaccurate. The ongoing hostilities have not only caused a humanitarian crisis in Yemen but have also impacted the global economic landscape, as the region remains a vital hub for energy exports. The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, fearing that further escalation could lead to a deeper regional instability. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sri Lanka Rescues 40 Iranian Sailors Facing Medical Emergencies at Sea]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12866/Sri-Lanka-Rescues-40-Iranian-Sailors-Facing-Medical-Emergencies-at-Sea?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12866/Sri-Lanka-Rescues-40-Iranian-Sailors-Facing-Medical-Emergencies-at-Sea?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Sri Lankan authorities have successfully coordinated the medical evacuation and repatriation of 40 Iranian sailors who were stranded in international waters. The group was brought ashore to receive urgent healthcare before being safely returned to their home country via air travel.Officials in Sri Lanka confirmed that the operation was initiated following a distress call regarding a significant medical emergency among crew members stationed on vessels off the island's southeastern coast. Thushara Rodrigo, a representative for the foreign ministry, explained that the mission was organized in close collaboration with the Iranian Embassy in Colombo. The rescued individuals were serving on various ships currently situated in international waters. After receiving the necessary medical attention in Colombo, the sailors were flown back to Iran on Saturday night. This humanitarian effort involved multiple local agencies and shipping companies to ensure the safety and health of the personnel involved.The presence of these vessels in the region is linked to a broader maritime situation involving a naval blockade. Reports indicate that approximately 21 Iranian vessels have been located in international waters near Sri Lanka recently. While Sri Lanka maintains a position of strict neutrality regarding international conflicts, the government emphasizes its commitment to international maritime law and humanitarian obligations. Authorities clarified that responding to distress calls is a standard international tradition and does not equate to taking sides or providing military or logistical support to the vessels themselves. The focus remains strictly on the preservation of human life and addressing health crises as they arise at sea.The regional maritime environment has been tense following a series of strikes and counter-strikes earlier this year that impacted trade routes, including the critical Strait of Hormuz. These events have left many commercial and naval personnel in difficult positions as negotiations continue. Sri Lanka has consistently declined requests for military access from various international parties, choosing instead to advocate for dialogue and peace. However, when it comes to life-threatening situations, the nation has stepped in. For instance, in March, rescue efforts were launched for survivors of a sunken vessel, the Iris Dena, which suffered a major incident off the coast. Anura Kumara Dissanayake has previously stated that the protection of humanity remains a priority for the nation regardless of the political climate.While this specific group of 40 sailors has been safely repatriated, challenges remain for other vessels in the area. Some reports suggest that nearly 19 other ships have noted shortages of essential supplies such as food and water. Sri Lankan officials have noted that while they respond to medical emergencies based on humanitarian grounds, they must also balance these actions with national interests. The successful repatriation of these 40 individuals marks a significant effort to address the human cost of maritime blockades and ensures that those in need of medical intervention are not left without assistance in international waters. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Netanyahu Warns of Severe Threat and Shares Simulated Image of Nuclear Strike]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12865/Netanyahu-Warns-of-Severe-Threat-and-Shares-Simulated-Image-of-Nuclear-Strike?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12865/Netanyahu-Warns-of-Severe-Threat-and-Shares-Simulated-Image-of-Nuclear-Strike?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Benjamin Netanyahu has issued a stark warning regarding the potential for nuclear conflict, sharing a simulated image of a strike to emphasize what he describes as a grave danger to the region. This development comes as political tensions rise ahead of upcoming parliamentary elections, with Netanyahu urging the public to focus on national security over domestic disputes.Benjamin Netanyahu recently took to social media to highlight what he views as a critical security challenge. In a post that has garnered significant attention, he shared an AI-generated image depicting a nuclear explosion over a major metropolitan area. This visual aid was intended to underscore his message that the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran represents a challenge that outweighs all other political or social concerns currently facing the country.The timing of the message is notable, occurring just days before a scheduled vote. Netanyahu argued that the various controversies dominating the news cycle—such as debates over military drafts or administrative scandals—are essentially distractions. He described these issues as a "smokescreen" that prevents the public from seeing the most pressing threat. According to his perspective, if a nuclear event were to occur, the current political disagreements would become irrelevant in the face of such a catastrophe.Central to Netanyahu’s argument is the belief that there is a specific and limited timeframe to address this security concern. He pointed to the current political landscape in the United States, specifically mentioning Donald Trump. Netanyahu suggested that the window of opportunity to take decisive action is tied to the support of certain international partners. He cautioned that failing to act during this period could be a mistake that future generations would not easily forgive. This stance aligns with public endorsements from Donald Trump, who has expressed support for Netanyahu’s approach to regional security.However, the message has met with sharp criticism from other political figures. Gadi Eisenkot, a prominent political actor, characterized Netanyahu’s post as a tactic designed to spread fear among the citizenry. Eisenkot accused him of using "hysterical" methods to influence voters at the ballot box, suggesting that the focus on mass destruction is a way to cover up previous policy shortcomings. Similarly, Yair Golan responded by calling for more restraint on social media, suggesting that the publication of such images indicates a lack of stability within the current leadership.Adding to the discussion, commentator Yuval Bloomberg has raised questions about the long-term sustainability of current security strategies. Bloomberg noted that the situation might change significantly after 2028, depending on who holds power in Washington. He echoed the sentiment that the nuclear issue is the single most important factor for the country's future, regardless of how contentious domestic politics may be at any given moment. Meanwhile, military officials like Eyal Zamir have reportedly indicated that there may not be an immediate operational necessity for preemptive strikes before the election, highlighting a divide between political rhetoric and military assessment.As the election nears, the debate over how to handle regional threats remains at the forefront of the national conversation. While some see the warnings as a necessary call to action, others view them as a calculated attempt to maintain power through the use of alarming imagery and high-stakes rhetoric. The public will ultimately decide which perspective they trust when they head to the polls. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Donald Trump Weighs Strategic Options on Iran as Regional Tensions Increase]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12864/Donald-Trump-Weighs-Strategic-Options-on-Iran-as-Regional-Tensions-Increase?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12864/Donald-Trump-Weighs-Strategic-Options-on-Iran-as-Regional-Tensions-Increase?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Donald Trump has indicated that a significant decision regarding the United States' stance toward Iran is approaching, as diplomatic discussions remain at a standstill and the possibility of renewed hostilities looms. While weighing whether to pursue a final military resolution or seek a new diplomatic agreement, Trump emphasized that the current situation requires a firm approach, stating that there is no room for games in international security matters.The deliberation comes at a sensitive time as the United States prepares for significant midterm elections scheduled for November 3. Trump has suggested that any major military action would likely be deferred until after the voting period has concluded. The ongoing conflict, which has persisted for nearly eight months, is a major point of concern for the public, particularly as it influences global energy markets and the cost of living. Voters are closely watching how the administration handles the situation, given that high fuel prices and economic stability are often tied to stability in the Middle East.In response to the growing uncertainty, the United States has noticeably bolstered its military presence in the region. Recent movements include the deployment of a third aircraft carrier strike group toward the Arabian Gulf. Security analysts and officials suggest that the window between the upcoming elections and the seating of the new Congress could be a high-risk period. Many see a negotiated settlement as the most viable path to de-escalation, yet the military remains prepared for all contingencies should diplomacy fail to produce a result.Parallel to these military movements, there has been a strategic reduction in diplomatic and military personnel in certain parts of the Middle East. This caution is driven by concerns over potential threats from regional actors and various groups in Yemen. Specifically, in Saudi Arabia, new safety protocols have been implemented for government personnel. Employees now require specialized authorization from the chief of mission to utilize airports within the country. Furthermore, travel restrictions are in place near the Yemen border, and specific cities such as Jizan, Yanbu, and Taif have been designated as areas requiring extra clearance due to safety risks. Citizens have been advised to remain vigilant regarding potential disruptions to air travel and regional security.On the maritime front, Brad Cooper, representing Central Command, recently visited the Strait of Hormuz to reaffirm the commitment to protecting international trade routes. The focus remains on ensuring the free flow of commerce, which is vital for the global economy. Central Command reported that the United States has played a key role in facilitating the export of over 1.5 billion barrels of oil from the Gulf since the summer. This effort includes clearing international shipping lanes of naval mines to ensure that commercial vessels can navigate safely. Cooper emphasized that the United States continues to work closely with regional partners and the shipping industry to maintain freedom of navigation in these critical waters, despite the ongoing geopolitical friction. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Record Early Voter Turnout as Candidates Campaign Across New York]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12863/Record-Early-Voter-Turnout-as-Candidates-Campaign-Across-New-York?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12863/Record-Early-Voter-Turnout-as-Candidates-Campaign-Across-New-York?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 10:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — New York is experiencing a historic surge in early voting, with nearly double the number of residents casting ballots on the first day compared to four years ago. As the early voting period continues through November 1, candidates are making a final push across the city to mobilize their supporters and address key issues ranging from childcare to economic stability.The high engagement levels were evident as approximately 265,000 people across the state participated in the first day of early voting. Within New York City alone, 87,000 voters showed up at polling sites. This massive turnout comes at a critical time, with only days remaining before the final election. Kathy Hochul and Bruce Blakeman have been traveling throughout the boroughs, highlighting their contrasting visions for the future of the state and its residents.During a recent campaign swing through Brooklyn, Kathy Hochul joined Zohran Mamdani to meet with commuters and residents. The two were seen riding the subway, where they engaged with local passengers about their daily concerns and education. This partnership has become a central element of the campaign strategy, aimed at connecting with younger and more progressive voters in neighborhoods like Greenpoint and Crown Heights. At a gathering near McCarren Park, the focus was largely on the expansion of 2-K childcare services, a program that has provided significant financial relief to many local families.Zohran Mamdani emphasized that the success of such social programs depends on steady leadership and continued funding. Many supporters in the area expressed their approval of the collaborative efforts to improve city services, noting that such initiatives bring a sense of progress to the community. The strategy appears focused on ensuring that voter enthusiasm remains high in high-density areas of Brooklyn, which are often pivotal in determining the outcome of statewide races.On the other side of the political aisle, Bruce Blakeman has been active in Staten Island, Queens, and South Brooklyn. Speaking to crowds in Dyker Heights, he offered a different perspective, criticizing the current direction of state policies. He raised concerns regarding the rising cost of living, high taxes, and the trend of residents moving out of the state in search of better economic opportunities. Joined by Nicole Malliotakis and Mike Lawler, he argued that the state needs a change in management to address these financial pressures and provide a more stable future for families.The campaign has also seen a flurry of media endorsements. While some major publications have backed Bruce Blakeman, citing the need for a check on specific political agendas, others have thrown their support behind Kathy Hochul, praising her handling of labor issues and public services. As the November 1 early voting deadline approaches, both sides are intensifying their efforts. The final days have seen large rallies with labor union members, including those representing hotel workers and university staff, all working to ensure their voices are heard at the ballot box. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Over 2,000 Residents Displaced in Hebron Following Intensified West Bank Operations]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12862/Over-2%2C000-Residents-Displaced-in-Hebron-Following-Intensified-West-Bank-Operations?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12862/Over-2%2C000-Residents-Displaced-in-Hebron-Following-Intensified-West-Bank-Operations?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 11:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — More than 2,000 residents in Hebron have been forced to leave their homes as security operations and lockdowns expand across the West Bank. The city remains under a strict closure, with military raids resulting in dozens of arrests and significant movement restrictions for hundreds of thousands of people.The situation in Hebron has reached a critical point as families report being forced out of their residences with very little notice. According to local officials, including Yousef al-Ja’bari, approximately 2,200 people have been displaced due to the ongoing military activity. These measures were implemented following a security incident involving a shooting that resulted in the deaths of two soldiers. In the aftermath, a total lockdown was ordered, effectively sealing off the city and preventing residents from entering or leaving.Witnesses describe a tense atmosphere where orders to evacuate were announced via loudspeakers late at night, leaving many families with no clear destination or time to gather their belongings. Israel Katz stated that those displaced would not be permitted to return to their neighborhoods until specific security objectives are met. This has left a large portion of the population in a state of uncertainty and fear, as the city of Hebron and its surrounding governorate—home to about 800,000 people—remain under what locals describe as a state of siege.The operations are not limited to Hebron. Reports indicate that security forces have conducted raids in at least 15 different areas across the West Bank, including major hubs like Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah, and East Jerusalem. During these actions, roughly 70 individuals were taken into custody. In some areas, such as the Jenin governorate, the raids led to confrontations resulting in injuries, while in Halhul, medical teams treated several people, including children, for the effects of tear gas inhalation used during the operations.The timing of these events is also significant, as Benjamin Netanyahu and other political figures navigate a period of high tension just days before scheduled elections. Observers suggest that the intensified security posture may be linked to the political climate, as leaders look to project a firm stance on security matters. Benjamin Netanyahu recently mentioned that significant developments could be expected regarding the administration of the region, though specific details remain unclear. In the meantime, movement for workers has been restricted, and a full closure of crossings is expected to coincide with the upcoming voting day.International observers and humanitarian organizations have expressed deep concern over the impact of these measures on the civilian population. António Guterres highlighted that the closures and home demolitions severely limit the freedom of movement and access to essential services for Palestinians. Rights groups, including B’Tselem, have warned that such large-scale restrictions and displacements could be viewed as a form of collective punishment. As the lockdown continues, the humanitarian situation remains a primary concern for those monitoring the region's stability. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Riyadh International Airport Resumes Flights Following Security Closure]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12861/Riyadh-International-Airport-Resumes-Flights-Following-Security-Closure?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12861/Riyadh-International-Airport-Resumes-Flights-Following-Security-Closure?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 11:02:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Flight operations have officially resumed at King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh after a two-week suspension. The reopening comes amid ongoing regional tensions and specific security warnings regarding the safety of the facility. Authorities confirmed that domestic and international travel has started to return to normal schedules despite the complex security environment.Travelers at King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh saw the return of flight activity this Sunday morning. The facility had been closed for approximately two weeks following a series of security incidents and strikes that impacted the Saudi capital. Monitoring services, such as Flight Radar, documented the first signs of resumed operations as aircraft began departing for domestic destinations, including Jeddah. This step marks a significant attempt to restore normalcy to the kingdom's primary aviation hub.The airport management has implemented a specific plan for the phased return of services. According to official communications, Terminal 1 is currently designated for domestic flight operations, while Terminal 2 is handling international flights operated by national carriers. This reorganization aims to streamline the flow of passengers and ensure that security protocols are strictly followed as the airport ramps up its capacity once again. The decision to reopen follows a period of intense scrutiny regarding the safety of the airspace and the ground infrastructure in the region.The background of this closure involves a significant escalation in regional conflict. After a truce that lasted several years broke down earlier this summer, there has been a resurgence in cross-border activity involving forces from Yemen. Recent weeks have seen a variety of strikes targeting Saudi infrastructure. One particularly severe incident earlier this month resulted in the deaths of 13 people and left over 300 individuals injured, marking one of the most serious security breaches the capital has faced in over a decade. These events necessitated the temporary shutdown of the airport to assess risks and bolster defensive measures.Despite the resumption of flights, security concerns remain at the forefront. Yahya Saree has issued public warnings suggesting that the airport remains a potential target. In statements directed at international and local airlines, the warning emphasized that the facility might be considered unsafe for civilian use. This has created a tense atmosphere for travelers and airline operators alike. In response to these persistent threats, the Saudi-led military coalition reported that they successfully intercepted and shot down two drones in the Riyadh area early Sunday morning, demonstrating the ongoing high-alert status of the region's defense systems.The broader implications of this conflict continue to affect the humanitarian situation in Yemen, which remains one of the world's most vulnerable nations. The shift in the focus of regional tensions has deepened the challenges faced by civilians on both sides of the border. As Riyadh attempts to maintain its role as a global transit point, the stability of King Khalid International Airport serves as a critical indicator of the wider security landscape in the Middle East. For now, the airport remains operational, though under heavy surveillance and with a heightened sense of caution regarding future developments. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Regional Tensions Rise in the Gulf Amid New Security Threats and Economic Pressures]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12860/Regional-Tensions-Rise-in-the-Gulf-Amid-New-Security-Threats-and-Economic-Pressures?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12860/Regional-Tensions-Rise-in-the-Gulf-Amid-New-Security-Threats-and-Economic-Pressures?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:58:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Recent developments in the Middle East indicate a significant escalation in military and diplomatic activities as various regional powers navigate a landscape defined by security threats, economic sanctions, and maritime disputes. Tensions have reached a critical point with new warnings regarding the presence of military vessels in the Persian Gulf and a series of strikes affecting infrastructure and civilian safety in neighboring territories.The situation in the Persian Gulf has intensified following a direct warning that foreign military ships would not be permitted to enter the waterway under any circumstances. This declaration comes at a time when officials in Washington have suggested the possibility of renewed military actions. The security environment is further complicated by reports of increased efforts to target international personnel across the Middle East, with intelligence suggesting that various plots have reached advanced stages. In Yemen and Saudi Arabia, the security situation remains volatile. Recent reports indicate that explosions were heard in Riyadh just as the international airport was preparing to resume operations after a period of closure. The airport has been a repeated target of strikes, which have resulted in casualties and significant disruption to travel. Meanwhile, military groups in Yemen have claimed responsibility for launching missiles and drones at several Saudi airports and energy facilities, including a major east-west oil pipeline. These actions have prompted the Saudi-led coalition to intercept multiple missiles aimed at southern regions of the kingdom, highlighting the ongoing cycle of retaliation and defense.The economic impact of the conflict is being felt deeply within the region and across global markets. Masoud Pezeshkian has acknowledged that many people are struggling to secure food due to the combined effects of the conflict and the resulting sanctions. He described the current state as one of neither total war nor complete peace, calling for a resolution to the stalemate. Simultaneously, global oil prices have surged, with Brent crude reaching its highest levels in months. This increase is driven by concerns over the security of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime corridor for global energy supplies. Donald Trump has commented on the situation, suggesting that the control of the waterway remains a strategic priority and indicating that economic pressure will continue until a resolution is reached.Diplomacy remains a faint but present possibility. Representatives from several European and Middle Eastern nations, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, recently gathered in Istanbul to discuss de-escalating the situation. The talks focused on restoring navigational freedom in the Strait of Hormuz and finding a peaceful path forward for the region. Additionally, reports suggest that mediation efforts through Pakistan continue to be explored, with potential discussions centered on lifting naval blockades in exchange for reopening critical shipping lanes. However, these diplomatic overtures are frequently overshadowed by military rhetoric and the threat of new strikes.Environmental concerns have also emerged, with a significant oil spill reported off the coast of the United Arab Emirates. The spill, which affected beaches in Umm Al Quwain, is believed to have originated from a tanker that was previously damaged in the Gulf. This incident underscores the collateral damage that maritime instability can cause to the region's delicate ecosystems. As the conflict drags on, some officials warn that it could continue for another year unless a meaningful agreement is reached regarding regional security and nuclear enrichment programs. For now, the region remains on high alert, with travel advisories updated for multiple countries and international staffing at various embassies being reduced as a precautionary measure. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Queens Resident Faces Attempted Murder Charges After Chaotic Stabbing Incident]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12859/Queens-Resident-Faces-Attempted-Murder-Charges-After-Chaotic-Stabbing-Incident?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12859/Queens-Resident-Faces-Attempted-Murder-Charges-After-Chaotic-Stabbing-Incident?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A 48-year-old man in Queens has been arrested and charged with multiple counts of attempted murder following a violent confrontation inside a residence that eventually led to a police-involved shooting. The incident, which unfolded on Friday night, left several people injured and a woman hospitalized after being struck by gunfire from responding officers.The individual taken into custody has been identified by authorities as Rashaun Donovan. He faces serious legal consequences, including two counts of attempted murder, four counts of assault, and criminal possession of a weapon. The legal proceedings follow a high-tension evening at a home located on 149th Street, where a domestic disturbance escalated into a life-threatening situation for the occupants. Residents of the home described a scene of terror that began while they were engaged in routine evening activities, such as watching television.According to witnesses, the violence erupted around 9:30 p.m. when a dispute involving two men who had been at the house throughout the day turned physical. One long-term resident, Edward Grant, explained that the situation moved from a verbal disagreement to a violent assault. He noted that a visitor in the home allegedly armed himself with two knives and began attacking others. One resident was reportedly stabbed in the shoulder before the suspect forced his way into a third-floor bedroom by breaking down the door. In an effort to defend themselves, the occupants attempted to use pepper spray to halt the attacker's advance.As the situation spiraled out of control, multiple emergency calls were made reporting a stabbing and a potential home invasion. When law enforcement arrived at the scene, the residents assisted them in gaining entry to the building by throwing keys out of a window. Upon entering the third-floor bedroom, officers encountered a chaotic scene involving three people struggling on the floor. According to police reports, two men were on the ground with a woman on top of them, all caught in a physical altercation to control the weapon.Law enforcement officials stated that while the two men complied with orders to separate and show their hands, the woman involved did not follow the same commands. Authorities claim she moved toward officers while still holding a knife, prompting them to discharge their weapons. She was reportedly shot twice and subsequently tased. However, Edward Grant, who identified the woman as his girlfriend, disputed the official account. He argued that the encounter lasted only seconds and that his girlfriend was likely in a state of shock, possibly unaware she still held the knife while trying to protect others from the primary attacker.The woman is currently recovering from her injuries, and police have clarified that they do not believe she was responsible for the initial stabbing or the disturbance. Grant himself received medical treatment for several injuries sustained while trying to restrain the suspect. The investigation into the exact sequence of events is ongoing, and investigators are reviewing body-worn camera footage to determine the specifics of the police response during the final moments of the confrontation. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zohran Mamdani Casts Early Ballot at New York City’s Metropolitan Museum of Art]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12858/Zohran-Mamdani-Casts-Early-Ballot-at-New-York-City%E2%80%99s-Metropolitan-Museum-of-Art?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12858/Zohran-Mamdani-Casts-Early-Ballot-at-New-York-City%E2%80%99s-Metropolitan-Museum-of-Art?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Zohran Mamdani participated in the first day of early voting in New York City by casting a ballot at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. During the visit, the focus was placed on the convenience of early voting and the importance of several city-wide ballot proposals aimed at improving government efficiency.On a busy Saturday morning, Mayor Zohran Mamdani arrived at the Ruth and Harold D. Uris Center for Education, located on the ground floor of the iconic museum on 5th Avenue. Bringing a gesture of appreciation for the staff, Mamdani carried boxes of donuts for the poll workers. After engaging with citizens and election officials, the vote was cast, marking the start of a nine-day early voting period that concludes on November 1.Speaking to the media outside the museum, Mamdani highlighted the unique nature of the polling location, noting that New York is likely the only place where one can vote inside such a world-renowned cultural institution. The emphasis was on the speed and accessibility of the process, with an encouraging message to residents that early voting can take as little as five minutes. This effort is part of a broader push to increase voter turnout across the city’s various districts.The ballot this year is comprehensive, featuring races for Governor, Attorney General, and State Comptroller, alongside key seats in the Senate and House of Representatives. However, Mamdani also drew attention to the five specific proposals found on the back of the ballot. These measures were developed by a commission focused on government efficiency. They include plans to streamline housing construction, enhance street safety, and simplify the process for small businesses to establish outdoor dining areas. By supporting these measures, the goal is to save the city money and make administrative processes move faster for all residents.The atmosphere at the Metropolitan Museum of Art was positive, with many voters expressing a preference for casting their ballots ahead of the traditional election day. Residents like Rebecca Ascher noted the ease of the process and the beauty of the morning, reflecting a general sense of civic duty among those in line. The early voting period is designed to alleviate long lines on the final Tuesday and provide more flexibility for those with busy schedules.In the broader political landscape, Mamdani has been seen campaigning alongside Kathy Hochul. The two have been active in various neighborhoods, including recent stops in Williamsburg’s McCarren Park and on the G train. Their joint efforts focus on community engagement and promoting a unified vision for the city’s future. While campaigning, Mamdani has voiced support for policies that prioritize public services and community welfare, contrasting these views with those of challengers like Bruce Blakeman. As the election approaches, the collaboration between city and state leaders remains a central theme in the efforts to mobilize the local electorate. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[US Eases Trade Restrictions on Canadian Imports Ahead of Midterm Vote]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12857/US-Eases-Trade-Restrictions-on-Canadian-Imports-Ahead-of-Midterm-Vote?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12857/US-Eases-Trade-Restrictions-on-Canadian-Imports-Ahead-of-Midterm-Vote?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 11:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — The United States has announced a strategic shift in its trade policy by lifting specific tariffs on a variety of Canadian goods. This decision comes at a critical time as regional leaders look toward the upcoming midterm elections and the economic health of border states. The move is expected to provide relief to several industries that have been caught in the middle of a prolonged trade dispute between the two North American neighbors.The administration in Washington has confirmed that, starting in late October, several categories of Canadian imports will no longer be subject to the heavy 50% tariffs previously imposed. The list of items seeing relief includes plywood sheets, various paper products, specialized machinery, and industrial refrigeration equipment. These changes were officially signaled following intensive discussions regarding the impact of trade barriers on domestic industries, particularly those situated in states that share a border with Canada.A significant driver behind this policy adjustment was the advocacy of Susan Collins. Representing Maine, Susan Collins highlighted the strain that trade restrictions have placed on local agricultural sectors. By lobbying for these exemptions, Susan Collins aimed to support producers of blueberries, apples, potatoes, and seaweed, all of whom rely heavily on smooth trade transitions across the border. Maine’s economy is deeply integrated with the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Quebec, making any shift in tariff policy a matter of local economic survival.The trade friction began in earnest when talks between the two nations stalled in August, leading to a 50% levy on approximately $20 billion worth of Canadian goods. In response, Mark Carney oversaw a series of countermeasures designed to protect local workers and match the American tariffs "dollar for dollar." Donald Trump had initially introduced the tariffs, citing concerns over the treatment of American exports in sectors such as dairy, alcohol, and automotive manufacturing. While some tariffs are being removed now, others are being introduced on different categories, such as carpets and certain waste materials, indicating that the trade relationship remains complex.The timing of the announcement is noteworthy, appearing just before the midterm elections that will decide the balance of power in Congress. Political figures like Troy Jackson have criticized the initial imposition of the tariffs, suggesting that the trade war has increased costs for everyday citizens. Meanwhile, in other trade-dependent states like Michigan, Mike Rogers has also urged for a conclusion to the trade standoff to stabilize the regional economy. Despite the tensions, Donald Trump noted that Canada is making efforts toward a new trade agreement.Dominic LeBlanc, representing Canadian internal trade interests, stated that the nation is evaluating these new steps and remains ready to work toward a relationship that benefits both sides. Mark Carney has expressed a willingness to wait for a fair deal, suggesting that while Canada prefers a quick resolution, they are prepared to hold out for terms that respect their national interests. Recent meetings involving the Canada-United States Economic Relations Advisory Committee continue to monitor the ongoing effects of these trade policies as both nations navigate their shared economic future. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[United States Orders Diplomatic Families to Leave Saudi Arabia After Recent Attacks]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12856/United-States-Orders-Diplomatic-Families-to-Leave-Saudi-Arabia-After-Recent-Attacks?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12856/United-States-Orders-Diplomatic-Families-to-Leave-Saudi-Arabia-After-Recent-Attacks?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 11:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — The United States government has issued a formal order for the families of diplomats and non-essential personnel to depart from its missions in Saudi Arabia following a series of security incidents and regional hostilities. The decision to reduce the diplomatic presence in the kingdom comes as a response to an increase in drone and missile strikes targeting civilian infrastructure and energy facilities. Officials confirmed that the departure order specifically applies to non-emergency employees and their family members, reflecting a heightened level of caution amid the evolving security landscape in the Middle East. While the immediate focus is on missions within Saudi Arabia, reports indicate that similar measures are being considered for other diplomatic posts across the Gulf region to ensure the safety of government personnel.The security situation intensified following recent strikes that resulted in civilian casualties and damage to key sites. In one instance, an attack on King Fahd International Airport in Dammam led to the loss of life and multiple injuries, causing significant disruptions to international travel and local operations. Additionally, an energy facility at the Shaybah oilfield was targeted, further highlighting the risks posed to critical infrastructure in the region. These events have prompted the embassy in Riyadh to issue urgent security alerts, advising citizens and staff to remain vigilant as the threat of further aerial operations remains high.This move to withdraw family members and non-essential staff marks a shift in the diplomatic posture in the region. Earlier this year, some personnel had returned to their posts, but the resurgence of conflict has forced a reassessment of safety protocols. The ongoing hostilities have not only impacted local security but have also created ripples in the global energy market and the regional economy. The disruption of trade routes and the threat to oil production facilities continue to be a major concern for international observers and economic analysts.The broader regional conflict has led to increased tensions across several borders, drawing in multiple actors and complicating efforts to maintain stability. The embassy in Riyadh and other strategic locations have previously been the focus of security concerns, including drone-related incidents. As the situation develops, the focus remains on protecting civilian lives and ensuring that diplomatic operations can continue under secure conditions. The departure of families is a standard precautionary measure often taken when the risk level to non-combatants and non-essential staff is deemed too high by security experts.In light of these developments, residents and travelers in the region are being urged to follow official safety guidelines and stay informed through reliable communication channels. The focus of the international community remains on de-escalation and the protection of civilian infrastructure from further harm. For now, the reduced footprint at the missions serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing the region as it navigates a period of significant volatility and strategic shifts. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Trump Administration Files Lawsuit to Halt Alaska Election Certification Over Name Confusion]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12855/Trump-Administration-Files-Lawsuit-to-Halt-Alaska-Election-Certification-Over-Name-Confusion?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12855/Trump-Administration-Files-Lawsuit-to-Halt-Alaska-Election-Certification-Over-Name-Confusion?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A legal dispute has emerged in Alaska as the administration of Donald Trump seeks to prevent the certification of Senate election results, citing potential voter confusion between two candidates sharing the name Dan Sullivan. The lawsuit argues that the presence of another individual with the same name on the ballot could unfairly impact the outcome for the Republican incumbent. The justice department filed a federal lawsuit on Thursday, asserting that the inclusion of a second Dan Sullivan on the ballot might lead voters to mistakenly cast their ballots for the wrong person. This legal move comes amid a highly competitive race between Republican Dan Sullivan and contender Mary Peltola. Recent polling suggests a tight contest, with Peltola maintaining a slim lead as the election approaches. The government is requesting that a judge prevent the state from certifying the final results if Dan Sullivan loses by a margin smaller than the total votes received by the other candidate with the same name.Donald Trump addressed the legal action after arriving in Florida for a campaign event, confirming his personal involvement in the decision to move forward with the case. He characterized the candidacy of the second Dan Sullivan as a deceptive tactic and stated that his administration is exploring significant legal avenues to address the situation. The individual at the center of the controversy, a retired teacher, has previously denied that his decision to run for office had any hidden or malicious motives. Despite these claims, earlier attempts to have him removed from the ballot were unsuccessful, with the Alaska Supreme Court previously rejecting such requests.For the upcoming election, the Republican official will be identified on the ballot as the incumbent. However, Alaska's unique ranked-choice voting system adds a layer of complexity. Under this system, there is a possibility that voters might select both individuals named Dan Sullivan if they are uncertain about which candidate is the Republican representative. The justice department argued in court filings that Alaska would be failing in its duty to maintain the integrity of the electoral process if it includes results that are potentially influenced by the presence of Daniel J. Sullivan on the ballot.The second candidate, who previously worked for the U.S. Forest Service and was once associated with the Alaska Independence Party, registered as a Republican earlier this year. Associate Attorney General Stanley E. Woodward Jr. claimed in the legal filing that the primary goal of this candidacy was to divert votes away from the incumbent and indirectly benefit Mary Peltola's campaign. Woodward argued that the likelihood of voter confusion is high enough to distort the true will of the Alaskan electorate, thereby calling into question the integrity of the entire certification process.In response to these allegations, Dan J. Sullivan has maintained that he has no connection to the Peltola campaign and expressed his hope that voters would be well-informed. He emphasized that having multiple choices is a positive aspect of democracy and that voter intent is naturally varied. The lawsuit suggests that if Peltola wins by a narrow margin, the certification should be paused to allow for an investigation into whether name confusion played a role in the final tally. This Senate race is one of the most closely watched in the country, especially as the political climate in Alaska is influenced by various economic and geopolitical factors. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zohran Kwame Mamdani Celebrates Major Renewal of Edenwald Community Facilities in the Bronx]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12853/Zohran-Kwame-Mamdani-Celebrates-Major-Renewal-of-Edenwald-Community-Facilities-in-the-Bronx?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12853/Zohran-Kwame-Mamdani-Celebrates-Major-Renewal-of-Edenwald-Community-Facilities-in-the-Bronx?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:48:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — Significant improvements have arrived at the Edenwald Houses in the Bronx as city officials and community leaders recently gathered to celebrate the reopening of vital social service hubs. This transformation, part of a massive $783 million investment, brings a new era of dignity and modern living to the thousands of residents in the area. The project not only renovates individual homes but also restores centers for seniors, children, and the broader community that had been neglected for decades.The recent ceremony at Edenwald Houses marked a turning point for one of the largest residential developments in the Bronx. Zohran Kwame Mamdani led the announcement, highlighting the completion of a nearly $800 million PACT conversion project. This initiative has successfully modernized more than 2,000 units, addressing long-standing issues such as mold, lead paint, and broken infrastructure. For the 5,000 people who call Edenwald home, these changes represent more than just physical repairs; they symbolize a restoration of respect and safety.A major highlight of the event was the official reopening of the Susan Wagner Day Care, the Edenwald Community Center, and the senior center. The senior center, in particular, had been closed for 25 years, leaving the elderly population without a dedicated space for social connection and support. During the reopening, it was announced that the facility would be named the Walter J. McNeill Senior Center, honoring the local Tenant Association leader who has advocated for the residents for over half a century. McNeill’s leadership was cited as a primary reason for the project's success, as he ensured the voices of the residents were prioritized during the planning stages.The renovations go beyond cosmetic changes. The buildings now feature new roofs, upgraded lobbies, enhanced security measures, and reliable climate control systems, including heat for the winter and cooling for the summer. The community and senior centers received $8.1 million in specific upgrades, including modern flooring, new windows, and a state-of-the-art commercial kitchen. These spaces will now host programs run by nonprofits like Regional Aid for Interim Needs, providing transportation and social services to local seniors.The history of Edenwald is rich, once serving as the foundation for legendary artists like the Gonzalez brothers, who became icons of Latin jazz. However, decades of disinvestment had led to deteriorating conditions. Zohran Kwame Mamdani emphasized that this renewal is part of a broader "Block by Block" housing strategy, which includes a $5.6 billion capital commitment to revitalize housing developments across the city. This plan aims to empower residents by giving them a say in how their spaces are managed and maintained, ensuring that public housing remains a stable refuge for future generations.During the gathering, other leaders, including Carl Heastie, Jamaal Bailey, and Vanessa Gibson, expressed their commitment to the Bronx. Heastie noted the personal importance of the project, having grown up in the district and played basketball at the development. The collaborative effort between public agencies like NYCHA and private partners like Camber Property Group was credited for meeting the ambitious goals of the conversion. As the project nears 95 percent completion, the focus shifts to maintaining these new standards and ensuring that accountability remains a priority for the management teams involved.Ultimately, the reopening of these centers serves as a testament to what community organizing can achieve. Residents who once faced leaking ceilings and lack of heat are now moving into fully renovated homes with modern amenities. The goal is to ensure that no resident has to wait decades for the basic dignity of a well-maintained home. The event concluded with a sense of hope, as the new Walter J. McNeill Senior Center stands as a beacon of what is possible when government and community members work toward a shared vision of progress. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Teenager Arrested Following Fatal Midtown Subway Shooting Over Smoking Dispute]]></title>
      <link>https://alhawadeth.net/news/12852/Teenager-Arrested-Following-Fatal-Midtown-Subway-Shooting-Over-Smoking-Dispute?lang=en</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://alhawadeth.net/news/12852/Teenager-Arrested-Following-Fatal-Midtown-Subway-Shooting-Over-Smoking-Dispute?lang=en</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:44:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[NEW YORK ALHAWADETH — A 17-year-old boy has been taken into custody and charged with murder following a tragic shooting at a Midtown Manhattan subway station. The incident, which claimed the life of a 26-year-old man, reportedly began as a verbal altercation regarding smoking on a train. Authorities identified the suspect as Xavian Collins, who now faces serious legal consequences for the weekend violence that has once again raised concerns about safety within the city's transit system.The shooting took place on a Saturday afternoon at the 7th Avenue-53rd Street station, a busy transit hub in the heart of Manhattan. According to investigators, the victim, identified as Darryl Rodriguez, was shot in the chest during the confrontation. Despite the efforts of emergency responders, the young man did not survive the injury. The loss has devastated his family and friends, particularly as it was revealed that he was simply making his way home from work when the encounter occurred.Law enforcement officials utilized surveillance footage to track the movements of the suspect. The video evidence showed a young male wearing a distinctive black Moncler vest over red clothing, holding a firearm pointed toward the victim. This footage was instrumental in identifying Collins and leading to his eventual arrest. Detectives believe the conflict started when Collins began smoking marijuana inside the subway car, prompting Rodriguez to confront him. The argument quickly escalated from words to physical violence, resulting in the fatal discharge of a weapon.Police recovered a shell casing from inside the subway car where the shooting occurred, which will serve as a key piece of evidence in the upcoming trial. Collins was arraigned recently and is currently being held without bail as the legal process moves forward. The charges against him include murder and criminal possession of a weapon. The swift action by the New York Police Department has been noted by transit officials, who emphasized that such violence has no place in public spaces.This incident marks a troubling trend in transit-related violence. Statistics show that this was the seventh homicide recorded within the city's subway system this year, a notable increase compared to the four homicides reported during the same period in the previous year. The rise in such incidents has prompted calls for increased security measures and a more visible police presence on platforms and inside trains to ensure the safety of millions of daily commuters.Public officials have expressed their condolences to the family of Rodriguez and reiterated their commitment to seeking justice. The focus now turns to the court system to ensure that the individual responsible for this act of violence is held accountable. The community continues to mourn the loss of a young man whose life was cut short by a senseless dispute over a violation of transit rules. As New Yorkers navigate their daily commutes, this event serves as a somber reminder of the ongoing challenges regarding public safety and the need for conflict resolution that does not involve violence. — BY ALHAWADETH]]></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>